Rev. Date: 03-Aug-12
Art: 716675-00L
CK-MB - 3
following an MI, in contrast to up to 5 days for cTnI or 10 days for cTnT.
3,4,5,6,7
Clinical studies have also
demonstrated a close relationship between the extent of injury to the myocardium (infarct size) following
MI and increased serum CK-MB mass concentrations.
8
Similarly, significant correlations have been
observed between CK-MB estimated infarct sizing and left ventricular echocardiography.
8
Other conditions involving skeletal muscle damage like accidents, blunt trauma, severe burns, and
extreme exercise or myopathic disorders such as myocarditis that are not secondary to ischemic
coronary artery disease can also lead to skeletal muscle or myocardial injury and have the potential to
cause elevations in the blood concentrations of CK-MB. These conditions should be considered when
interpreting results, and the CK-MB level should be used in conjunction with clinical symptoms, signs,
patient history, and ECG changes.
1,9
Performance Characteristics
Precision data were collected in multiple sites as follows: Duplicates of each control were tested daily
for a period of 20 days for each of three lots of cartridges, resulting in a total of 120 replicates. The
average statistics are presented below.
Method comparison data were collected using CLSI guideline EP9-A2.
10
Venous blood samples were
collected in heparinized evacuated tubes and analyzed in duplicate on the i-STAT System. A portion
of the specimen was centrifuged and the separated plasma was analyzed in duplicate on the i-STAT
System and on the comparative method within 1 hour of collection.
Deming regression analysis
11
was performed on the first replicate of each sample. In the method
comparison table, n is the number of specimens in the first data set, Sxx and Syy refer to estimates of
imprecision based on the duplicates of the comparative and the i-STAT methods respectively. Sy.x is the
standard error of the estimate, and r is the correlation coefficient.*
Method comparisons may vary from site to site due to differences in sample handling, comparative
method calibration and other site specific variables.
Interference studies were based on CLSI guideline EP7-A.
12
*The usual warning relating to the use of regression analysis is summarized here as a reminder. For any analyte, “if the data is a narrow range, the
estimate of the regression parameters are relatively imprecise and may be biased. Therefore, predictions made from estimates may be invalid”,
10
The
correlation coefficient, r, can be used as a guide to assess the adequacy of the comparative method range in overcoming the problem. As a guide,
the range of data can be considered adequate if r>0.975.
Precision Data (ng/mL)
Plasma Control
Mean
SD
%CV
Level 1
5.9
0.7
11.9
Level 2
25.8
2.7
10.4
Level 3
90.1
9.0
10.0
Summary of Contents for i-STAT 1
Page 1: ...i STAT 1 System Manual Rev Date 20 Jan 12 Art 714336 00L ...
Page 18: ...1 8 Art 714363 00U Rev Date 02 Aug 12 ...
Page 44: ......
Page 90: ......
Page 106: ...9 12 Art 714371 00E Rev Date 06 Aug 12 ...
Page 162: ......
Page 166: ...Art 730292 00A Rev Date 20 Feb 12 4 ...
Page 176: ...10 10 Art 714372 00L Rev Date 30 Jul 12 ...
Page 182: ...11 6 Art 714373 00F Rev Date 17 Jan 11 ...
Page 184: ...12 2 Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 ...
Page 185: ...Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 12 3 ...
Page 186: ...12 4 Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 ...
Page 187: ...Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 12 5 ...
Page 192: ......
Page 194: ......
Page 214: ...14 20 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 216: ...14 22 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 218: ...14 24 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 220: ...14 26 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 222: ...14 28 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 224: ...14 30 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 226: ......
Page 236: ......
Page 252: ...17 4 Art 714379 00F Rev Date 18 Jul 12 ...
Page 254: ......
Page 294: ...Art 725768 00E Rev Date 04 Jan 12 20 ...
Page 336: ...22 2 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 342: ...22 8 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 348: ...22 14 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 352: ...22 18 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 364: ...22 30 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 384: ...22 50 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 404: ...22 70 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 488: ...Kaolin ACT 4 Art 715878 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 536: ......
Page 556: ...Art 714261 00E Rev Date 10 Jan 11 8 ...
Page 560: ...Art 716240 00D Rev Date 03 Mar 10 4 ...
Page 572: ...Art 715617 00D Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 578: ...Art 714547 00F Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 590: ...Art 720735 00B Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 592: ...Art 721106 00B Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 598: ...Art 722831 00A Rev Date 19 Feb 09 ...
Page 610: ...Art 720654 00B Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 614: ...Art 721317 00D Rev Date 13 Aug 12 4 ...
Page 616: ...Art 725703 00A Rev Date 08 Mar 10 2 ...
Page 618: ...Art 721296 00A Rev Date 07 16 08 ...
Page 620: ...REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 627: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 6 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 628: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 7 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 629: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 8 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 630: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 9 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 658: ......