NA - 2
Art:
714173-00M
Rev. Date: 11-Jul-11
The i-STAT reference range for whole blood listed above is similar to reference ranges derived from
serum or plasma measurements with standard laboratory methods.
The reference range programmed into the analyzer and shown above is intended to be used as a guide
for the interpretation of results. Since reference ranges may vary with demographic factors such as age,
gender and heritage, it is recommended that reference ranges be determined for the population being
tested.
Clinical Significance
Tests for sodium in the blood are important in the diagnosis and treatment of patients suffering from
hypertension, renal failure or impairment, cardiac distress, disorientation, dehydration, nausea and
diarrhea. Some causes of increased values for sodium include dehydration, diabetes insipidus, salt
poisoning, skin losses, hyperaldosteronism and CNS disorders. Some causes for decreased values
for sodium include dilutional hypona tremia (cirrhosis), depletional hyponatremia and syndrome of
inappropriate ADH.
Performance Characteristics
The typical performance data summarized below was collected in health care facilities by health care
professionals trained in the use of the i-STAT System and comparative methods.
Precision data were collected in multiple sites as follows: Duplicates of each control fluid were tested
in the morning and in the afternoon on five days for a total of 20 replicates. The averaged statistics are
presented below.
Method comparison data were collected using CLSI guideline EP9-A
4
. Venous blood samples were
collected in lithium heparin Vacutainer® tubes and analyzed in duplicate on the i-STAT System. A portion
of the specimen was centri fuged and the separated plasma was analyzed in duplicate on comparative
methods within 20 minutes of collection.
Deming regression analysis
5
was performed on the first replicate of each sample. In the method
comparison table, n is the number of specimens in the data set, Sxx and Syy refer to estimates of
imprecision based on the duplicates of the comparative and the i-STAT methods respectively, Sy.x is the
standard error of the estimate, and r is the correlation coefficient.*
Method comparisons will vary from site to site due to differences in sample handling, comparative
method calibration and other site specific variables.
Interference studies were based on CLSI guideline EP7.
6
*The usual warning relating to the use of regression analysis is summarized here as a reminder: For any analyte, “if the data is collected over a narrow
range, the estimate of the regression parameters are relatively imprecise and may be biased. Therefore, predictions made from these estimates
may be invalid”.
4
The correlation coefficient, r, can be used as a guide to assess the adequacy of the comparative method range in overcoming this
problem. As a guide, the range of data can be considered adequate if r>0.975.
Precision Data (mmol/L or mEq/L)
Aqueous Control
Mean
SD
%CV
Level 1
120.0
0.46
0.4
Level 3
160.0
0.53
0.3
Method Comparison (mmol/L or mEq/L)
Beckman Nova
Synchron Kodak STAT
CX
®
3 Ektachem
™
700
Profile
®
5
n
189 142 192
Sxx
0.74 0.52 0.54
Syy
0.53 0.58 0.53
Summary of Contents for i-STAT 1
Page 1: ...i STAT 1 System Manual Rev Date 20 Jan 12 Art 714336 00L ...
Page 18: ...1 8 Art 714363 00U Rev Date 02 Aug 12 ...
Page 44: ......
Page 90: ......
Page 106: ...9 12 Art 714371 00E Rev Date 06 Aug 12 ...
Page 162: ......
Page 166: ...Art 730292 00A Rev Date 20 Feb 12 4 ...
Page 176: ...10 10 Art 714372 00L Rev Date 30 Jul 12 ...
Page 182: ...11 6 Art 714373 00F Rev Date 17 Jan 11 ...
Page 184: ...12 2 Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 ...
Page 185: ...Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 12 3 ...
Page 186: ...12 4 Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 ...
Page 187: ...Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 12 5 ...
Page 192: ......
Page 194: ......
Page 214: ...14 20 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 216: ...14 22 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 218: ...14 24 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 220: ...14 26 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 222: ...14 28 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 224: ...14 30 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 226: ......
Page 236: ......
Page 252: ...17 4 Art 714379 00F Rev Date 18 Jul 12 ...
Page 254: ......
Page 294: ...Art 725768 00E Rev Date 04 Jan 12 20 ...
Page 336: ...22 2 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 342: ...22 8 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 348: ...22 14 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 352: ...22 18 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 364: ...22 30 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 384: ...22 50 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 404: ...22 70 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 488: ...Kaolin ACT 4 Art 715878 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 536: ......
Page 556: ...Art 714261 00E Rev Date 10 Jan 11 8 ...
Page 560: ...Art 716240 00D Rev Date 03 Mar 10 4 ...
Page 572: ...Art 715617 00D Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 578: ...Art 714547 00F Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 590: ...Art 720735 00B Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 592: ...Art 721106 00B Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 598: ...Art 722831 00A Rev Date 19 Feb 09 ...
Page 610: ...Art 720654 00B Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 614: ...Art 721317 00D Rev Date 13 Aug 12 4 ...
Page 616: ...Art 725703 00A Rev Date 08 Mar 10 2 ...
Page 618: ...Art 721296 00A Rev Date 07 16 08 ...
Page 620: ...REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 627: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 6 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 628: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 7 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 629: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 8 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 630: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 9 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 658: ......