3
Art: 715209-00E
Rev. Date: 06/11/08
Because the manufacturing process for the cartridges produces consistent lots with little lot-to-lot
variation, Abbott Point of Care Inc. does not make any recommendations for this procedure. Each
new lot of cartridges should be assessed using the i-STAT quality control solutions according to the
procedure in the System Manual.
troubleShootIng
Should quality control sample results fall outside of the acceptable ranges, calibration verification samples
with very low or very high concentrations could be helpful in characterizing a reagent problem. This
information would be most valuable if the user could affect a change in the calibration of the test system to
correct the problem.
The i-STAT System was designed so that the intended users, who are not familiar with laboratory
procedures, cannot make any adjustments that would affect results. The characteristics of the sensors
are well known and results of control solutions would be sufficient for Technical Support specialists to help
users resolve control out-of-range problems.
VerIfyIng that reSultS haVe not been affected by maIntenance or repaIr
procedureS
In multi-use systems, reagents and samples are run through the analyzer and, therefore, there should be a
method of checking that all components are performing together according to specifications after any one
component is affected. Calibration verification solutions can be used to verify that the calibration or slope
of the measuring system has not been affected by the maintenance or repair procedure.
The user cannot perform any maintenance procedures on the i-STAT System. However, the software in
the analyzer is updated periodically – a procedure that potentially could cause a change in results. In
fact, software updates are released to ensure that results do not change over time. Calibration verification
solutions could be tested to verify that results have not been affected. This procedures should be
suspended or replaced with controls once it has been determined that software updates do not affect
results. Since i-STAT has been effectively updating software for over 10 years, this procedure is not part of
Abbott Point of Care Inc’s. recommended quality program.
Repaired and newly purchased analyzers are received with factory calibration. Again, the Electronic
Simulator can better assure that the analyzer’s most important function is within factory specifications than
calibration verification or control solutions.
Testing calibration verification samples or comparing patient sample results on a new or repaired analyzer
with an older analyzer will assess cartridge performance only. Any variations in analyzer performance will
not be statistically discernable above the performance of the cartridges. When multiple analyzers are to be
used at a facility, Abbott Point of Care Inc. recommends including at least two analyzers in any performance
verification studies so that statistics reflect the “system.”
Summary of Contents for i-STAT 1
Page 1: ...i STAT 1 System Manual Rev Date 20 Jan 12 Art 714336 00L ...
Page 18: ...1 8 Art 714363 00U Rev Date 02 Aug 12 ...
Page 44: ......
Page 90: ......
Page 106: ...9 12 Art 714371 00E Rev Date 06 Aug 12 ...
Page 162: ......
Page 166: ...Art 730292 00A Rev Date 20 Feb 12 4 ...
Page 176: ...10 10 Art 714372 00L Rev Date 30 Jul 12 ...
Page 182: ...11 6 Art 714373 00F Rev Date 17 Jan 11 ...
Page 184: ...12 2 Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 ...
Page 185: ...Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 12 3 ...
Page 186: ...12 4 Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 ...
Page 187: ...Art 714374 00J Rev Date 25 Aug 11 12 5 ...
Page 192: ......
Page 194: ......
Page 214: ...14 20 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 216: ...14 22 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 218: ...14 24 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 220: ...14 26 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 222: ...14 28 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 224: ...14 30 Art 714376 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 226: ......
Page 236: ......
Page 252: ...17 4 Art 714379 00F Rev Date 18 Jul 12 ...
Page 254: ......
Page 294: ...Art 725768 00E Rev Date 04 Jan 12 20 ...
Page 336: ...22 2 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 342: ...22 8 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 348: ...22 14 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 352: ...22 18 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 364: ...22 30 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 384: ...22 50 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 404: ...22 70 Art 714384 00D Rev Date 07 18 06 ...
Page 488: ...Kaolin ACT 4 Art 715878 00M Rev Date 31 Jan 12 ...
Page 536: ......
Page 556: ...Art 714261 00E Rev Date 10 Jan 11 8 ...
Page 560: ...Art 716240 00D Rev Date 03 Mar 10 4 ...
Page 572: ...Art 715617 00D Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 578: ...Art 714547 00F Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 590: ...Art 720735 00B Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 592: ...Art 721106 00B Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 598: ...Art 722831 00A Rev Date 19 Feb 09 ...
Page 610: ...Art 720654 00B Rev Date 06 11 08 ...
Page 614: ...Art 721317 00D Rev Date 13 Aug 12 4 ...
Page 616: ...Art 725703 00A Rev Date 08 Mar 10 2 ...
Page 618: ...Art 721296 00A Rev Date 07 16 08 ...
Page 620: ...REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 627: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 6 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 628: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 7 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 629: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 8 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 630: ...PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR THE i STAT SYSTEM 9 REV DATE 16 Oct 12 ART 714446 00L ...
Page 658: ......