Dell S6000-ON, Руководство по настройке

Страница: 369 / 1080

• To ensure that protocol separation is done only for switch initiated traffic where the application acts
as client, only the destination TCP/UDP port is compared and not the source TCP/UDP port. The
source TCP/UDP port becomes a known port number when the box acts as server.
• TFTP is an exception to the preceding logic.
• For TFTP, data transfer is initiated on port 69, but the data transfer ports are chosen independently by
the sender and receiver during initialization of the connection. The ports are chosen at random
according to the parameters of the networking stack, typically from the range of temporary ports.
• If route lookup in EIS routing table succeeds, the application-specific packet count is incremented.
This counter is viewed using the
show management application pkt-cntr
command. This
counter is cleared using
clear management application pkt-cntr
command.
• If the route lookup in the EIS routing table fails or if management port is down, then packets are
dropped. The application-specific count of the dropped packets is incremented and is viewed using
the
show management application pkt-drop-cntr
command. This counter is cleared using
clear management application pkt-drop-cntr
command.
• Packets whose destination TCP/UDP port does not match a configured management application, take
the regular route lookup flow in the IP stack.
• In the ARP layer, for all ARP packets received through the management interface, a double route
lookup is done, one in the default routing table and another in the management EIS routing table. This
is because in the ARP layer, we do not have TCP/UDP port information to decide the table in which
the route lookup should be done.
• The
show arp
command is enhanced to show the routing table type for the ARP entry.
• For the
clear arp-cache
command, upon receiving the ARP delete request, the route
corresponding to the destination IP is identified. The ARP entries learned in the management EIS
routing table are also cleared.
• Therefore, a separate control over clearing the ARP entries learned via routes in the EIS table is not
present. If the ARP entry for a destination is cleared in the default routing table, then if an ARP entry
for the destination exists in the EIS table, that entry is also cleared.
• Because fallback support is removed, if the management port is down or the route lookup in EIS table
fails packets are dropped. Therefore, switch-initiated traffic sessions that used to work previously via
fallback may not work now.
Handling of Switch-Destined Traffic
• The switch processes all traffic received on the management port destined to the management port
IP address or the front-end port destined to the front-end IP address.
• If the source TCP/UDP port number matches a configured EIS or non-EIS management application
and the source IP address is a management Port IP address, then the EIS route lookup is done for the
response traffic and hence is sent out of the management port. In this case, the source IP address is a
management port IP address only if the traffic was originally destined to the management port IP.
• ICMP-based applications like ping and traceroute are exceptions to the preceding logic since we do
not have TCP/UDP port number. So if source IP address of the packet matches the management port
IP address EIS route lookup is done.
• Management application packet counter is incremented if EIS route lookup succeeds and packet is
sent out of the management port.
• If route lookup in the EIS routing table fails or if the management port is down, then packets are
dropped. The management application drop counter is incremented.
Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP)
369