V1.02
Thom Hogan’s Complete Guide to the Nikon D300
Page 374
between the expensive Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D AF-S and the
inexpensive Nikkor 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5D, at least when
mounted on a D300. But there is when used on a 35mm body
(though mostly in the corners).
Note: If you use your lenses on both a 35mm body (or the FX
sensor size of the D3) and the D300, you still must pay
close attention to corner issues. While the Nikkor 18-35mm
f/3.5-4.5D ED is all a D300 user needs in the way of
quality, I find the Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D AF-S far better
when used on my F5 or D3. When I shoot 35mm film—
especially with wide angle lenses—I usually choose the
more expensive lens.
Overall, here are the key differences between using a lens on
a 35mm film or FX digital body and the D300:
Lens Differences When Used for 35mm film or FX body vs D300
Item
35mm film or FX
D300 (DX)
Light Falloff
Significant in
corners
Generally
insignificant
Sharpness in
corners
Often slightly soft
Sharp as central
area
Colors in corners
Often slightly
muted, chromatic
aberration
Edge matches
center, little if any
chromatic
aberration
Angle of view
As published
Altered (see chart,
below)
Linear distortion*
Sometimes
significant
Reduced
Vignetting w/
Filters
Sometimes
significant
Reduced
*E.g. barrel distortion (typical of wide angle lenses) or pincushion
distortion (typical of telephoto lenses)
Items such as overall contrast, susceptibility to flare, center
sharpness, and overall coloration are virtually identical for
both 35mm/FX and D300 use of a lens.