Nace CP 1, Course Manual

Page: 288 / 535

RP0169-2002
NACE International 17
Riordan, M.A. “The Electrical Survey—What It Won’t Do.”
Materials Performance 17, 11 (1978): pp. 38-41.
Riordan, M.A., and R.P. Sterk. “Well Casing as an
Electrochemical Network in Cathodic Protection
Design.” Materials Performance 2, 7 (1963): pp. 58-68.
Schaschl, E., and G.A. Marsh. “Placement of Reference
Electrode and Impressed Current Anode Effect on
Cathodic Protection of Steel in a Long Cell.”
Materials
Performance 13, 6 (1974): pp. 9-11.
Stern, M. “Fundamentals of Electrode Processes in
Corrosion.” C
ORROSION
13, 11 (1957): pp. 775t-782t.
CEA 54277. “State-of-the-Art Report, Specialized Surveys
for Buried Pipelines.” Houston, TX: NACE, 1987
Thompson, N.G., and T.J. Barlo. “Fundamental Process of
Cathodically Protecting Steel Pipelines.” International
Gas Research Conference, 1983.
Toncre, A.C. “A Review of Cathodic Protection Criteria.”
Proceeding of Sixth European Congress on Metallic
Corrosion. Held London, England, September, 1977,
pp. 365-372.
Van Nouhuys, H.C. “Cathodic Protection and High
Resistivity Soil.” C
ORROSION
9 (1953): pp. 448-458.
Van Nouhuys, H.C. “Cathodic Protection and High
Resistivity Soil—A Sequel.” C
ORROSION
14, 12 (1958):
pp. 583-587.
Von Baekmann, W., A. Ballest, and W. Prinz. “New
Development in Measuring the Effectiveness of
Cathodic Protection.” Corrosion Australasia, February,
1983.
Von Baekmann, W., and W. Schwenk. Handbook of
Cathodic Protection. Portellis Press, 1975, Chapter 2.
Webster, R.D. “Compensating for the IR Drop Component
in Pipe-to-Soil Potential Measurements.”
Materials
Performance 26, 10 (1987): pp. 38-41.
Wyatt, B.S., K.C. Lax. “Close Interval Overline Polarized
Potential Surveys of Buried Pipelines.” UK Corrosion
Conference, 1985.
Stress Corrosion Cracking
Barlo, T.J., et al. “An Assessment of the Criteria for
Cathodic Protection of Buried Pipelines.” AGA Final
Report, Project PR-3-129, 1983.
Barlo, T.J., et al. “Controlling Stress-Corrosion Cracking by
Cathodic Protection.” AGA Annual Report, Project-3-
164, 1984.
Parkins, R.N., et al. “Hydrogen Gas Evolution From
Cathodically Protected Surfaces.” C
ORROSION
41
(1985): pp. 389-397.
Parkins, R.N., and R.R. Fessler. “Stress Corrosion
Cracking of High Pressure Gas Transmission
Pipelines.” Materials in Engineering Applications 1, pp.
80-96.
Parkins, R.N., and R.R. Fessler. “Line Pipe Stress
Corrosion Cracking—Mechanisms and Remedies.”
CORROSION/86 paper no. 320. Houston, TX: NACE,
1986.
Parkins, R.N., A.J. Markworth, and J.H. Holbrook.
“Hydrogen Gas Evolution From Cathodically Protected
Pipeline Steel Surfaces Exposed to Chloride-Sulfate
Solutions.”
C
ORROSION
44 (1988): pp. 572-580.
McCaffrey, W.R. “Effect of Overprotection on Pipeline
Coatings.”
Materials Protection and Performance 12, 2
(1973): p. 10.
PR-15-427. “An Assessment of Stress Corrosion Cracking
(SCC) Research for Line Pipe Steels.” AGA, 1985.
________________________________________________________________________
Section 7: Design of Cathodic Protection Systems
7.1 Introduction
7.1.1 This section recommends procedures for
designing cathodic protection systems that will provide
effective external corrosion control by satisfying one or
more of the criteria listed in Section 6 and exhibiting
maximum reliability over the intended operating life of
the systems.
7.1.2 In the design of a cathodic protection system,
the following should be considered:
7.1.2.1 Recognition of hazardous conditions
prevailing at the proposed installation site(s) and
the selection and specification of materials and
installation practices that ensure safe installation
and operation.
7.1.2.2 Specification of materials and installation
practices to conform to the latest editions of
applicable codes, National Electrical Manufac-
turers Association (NEMA)
(7)
standards, National
___________________________
(7)
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), 2101 L St., NW, Washington, DC 20037.