TM0101-2001
NACE International
11
protection with physical evidence from the tank to
determine whether corrosion has occurred.
8.6.2 Physical evidence of corrosion is determined by
evaluating items such as leak history data or buried
tank inspection report data regarding locations of
coating failures, localized conditions of more-corrosive
electrolyte, or whether substandard cathodic protection
levels have been experienced.
8.6.3 Cathodic protection shall be judged adequate at
the test site if:
(a) All valid tank-to-electrolyte potential measure-
ments are negative 850 mV, or more negative, with
respect to a CSE; and
(b) The significance of voltage drops has been
considered by applying the principles described in
Paragraph 8.6.1 and Paragraph 8.6.2.
8.7 Monitoring
8.7.1 When the significance of a voltage drop has
been considered at the test site, the measured
potentials
may
be
used
for
monitoring
unless
significant environmental, structural, coating integrity,
or
cathodic
protection
system
parameters
have
changed.
________________________________________________________________________
Section 9: Test Method 2—Negative 850-mV Polarized Tank-to-Electrolyte Potential of Steel Tanks
9.1 This section describes a method that uses an
interrupter(s) to eliminate the cathodic protection system
voltage
drop
from
the
tank-to-electrolyte
potential
measurement for comparison with the criterion stated in
NACE Standard RP0285:
1
“A negative polarized potential of at
least 850 mV relative to a saturated
copper/copper
sulfate
reference
electrode.”
If
direct-connected
galvanic
anodes
that
cannot
be
interrupted are present, this method is not applicable.
9.2 General
9.2.1 Interrupting
the
known
cathodic
protection
current source(s) eliminates voltage drops associated
with
the
protective
currents
being
interrupted.
However, significant voltage drops may also occur due
to currents from other sources.
9.2.2 Current sources that can affect the accuracy of
this test method include the following:
(a) Unknown,
inaccessible,
or
direct-connected
galvanic anodes;
(b) Other cathodic protection systems on associated
piping or foreign structures;
(c) Electric railway systems;
(d) Galvanic or bimetallic cells;
(e) DC mining equipment;
(f)
Adjacent
tanks,
electrically
connected
and
polarized to different potentials; and
(g) Unintentional connections to other structures or
bonds to mitigate interference.
9.2.3 To avoid significant depolarization of the tank,
the “off” period should be limited to the time necessary
to make an accurate potential measurement. The “off”
period is typically less than three seconds long.
9.3 Comparison with Other Methods
9.3.1 Advantages
(a) Voltage drops associated with the protective
currents being interrupted are eliminated.
9.3.2 Disadvantages
(a) Additional equipment is required;
(b) Additional time may be required to set up
equipment and to make tank-to-electrolyte potential
measurements; and
(c) Test results are difficult or impossible to analyze if
stray currents are present or foreign impressed current
devices are present and cannot be interrupted.
9.4 Basic Test Equipment
9.4.1 A voltmeter with adequate input impedance.
Commonly used digital instruments have a nominal
impedance of 10 megohms. An analog instrument with
an internal resistance of 100,000 ohms per volt may be
adequate in certain circumstances in which the circuit
resistance is low.
A potentiometer circuit may be
necessary in other instances.
9.4.2 Meter leads with insulated wire and terminal
connections suitable for making reliable electrical
contact with the tank and reference electrode. Color-
coded meter leads are suggested to avoid confusion of
polarity of the measured value.
9.4.3 A CSE or other standard reference electrode
may be used.
Reference electrodes that may be
substituted for the CSE are described in Paragraph 5.5.
9.4.4 Sufficient and adequate means to interrupt
cathodic protection current sources simultaneously
such as sacrificial anodes, rectifiers, and electrical
bonds that are influencing the tank.
Summary of Contents for CP 1
Page 1: ...CP 1 Cathodic Protection Tester Course Manual February 2005 NACE International 2000 ...
Page 265: ......
Page 266: ......
Page 267: ......
Page 268: ......
Page 301: ...RP0169 2002 32 NACE International ISBN 1 57590 035 1 ...
Page 535: ...TM0101 2001 24 NACE International ISBN 1 57590 137 4 ...