
43
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS INFORMATION
, continued
Branch H
Check operation of the instrument and/or apparatus used to perform the
test. Check glassware used in the procedure and make sure it is extremely
clean. Dirty pipets and graduated cylinders can cause contamination and
will not deliver the correct volume. Check delivery of pipets by using
deionized water and a balance; 0.2 mL = 0.2 grams.
If a defect is found in the instrument and/or apparatus, repeat Branch B
after repair or replacement. If the instrument and apparatus are working,
proceed with Branch I.
Branch I
After determining the procedure, reagents, instrument and/or apparatus
are correct and working properly, you may conclude the only possible
cause for standard additions not functioning correctly in deionized water
is the standard used for performing standard additions. Obtain a new
standard and repeat Branch B.
Branch J
If the standard additions gives the correct result, the analyst must then
determine if an interfering substance(s) is present. If interfering
substances are present, proceed to Branch C. If they are not present, the
analysis is correct.
If you still cannot identify the problem, extra help is available. Please call
our Technical Support Group at 800-227-4224 (U.S.A.) or 970-669-3050.
A representative will be happy to help you.
Method Performance
Estimated Detection Limit
Ranges for chemical measurements have limits. The lower limit is
important because it determines whether a measurement is different from
zero. Many experts disagree about the definition of this detection limit,
and determining it can be difficult. The Code of Federal Regulations (40
CFR, Part 136, Appendix B) provides a procedure to determine the
“Method Detection Limit” or MDL. The MDL is the lowest concentration
that is different from zero with a 99% level of confidence. A measurement
below this MDL may be useful, but there is a greater chance that it is
actually zero.
The MDL is not fixed; it varies for each reagent lot, instrument, analyst,
sample type, etc. Therefore, a published MDL may be a useful guide, but
is only accurate for a specific set of circumstances. Each analyst should
determine a more accurate MDL for each specific sample matrix using the
same equipment, reagents and standards that will routinely be used
for measurements.
Summary of Contents for DR/850
Page 2: ...2...
Page 8: ...8...
Page 9: ...9 Sample Procedure Explained...
Page 10: ...10 Sample Procedure Explained continued...
Page 11: ...11 Sample Procedure Explained continued...
Page 12: ...12 Sample Procedure Explained continued...
Page 41: ...41 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS INFORMATION continued Figure 10 Multiple Standard Additions Graph...
Page 69: ...69 SECTION 4 PROCEDURES...
Page 70: ...70...
Page 92: ...92...
Page 100: ...100...
Page 108: ...108...
Page 116: ...116...
Page 139: ...139...
Page 140: ...140...
Page 168: ...168...
Page 176: ...176...
Page 184: ...184...
Page 194: ...194...
Page 202: ...202...
Page 214: ...214...
Page 234: ...234...
Page 242: ...242...
Page 264: ...264...
Page 270: ...270...
Page 284: ...284...
Page 298: ...298...
Page 314: ...314...
Page 324: ...324...
Page 332: ...332...
Page 336: ...336...
Page 340: ...340...
Page 354: ...354...
Page 370: ...370...
Page 378: ...378...
Page 386: ...386...
Page 398: ...398...
Page 404: ...404...
Page 412: ...412...
Page 424: ...424...
Page 436: ...436...
Page 446: ...446...
Page 456: ......
Page 459: ......
Page 460: ...460...