![SAF CFIP PhoeniX C Скачать руководство пользователя страница 132](http://html.mh-extra.com/html/saf/cfip-phoenix-c/cfip-phoenix-c_technical-description_796097132.webp)
132
CFIP PhoeniX C Series TDM/IP Split Mount System Technical Description and Configuration Guide
•
Rev. 1.0
•
© SAF Tehnika JSC 2013
channel ETH 4 at slave unit. The proprietary aggregation algorithm divides traffic into two way on the
base of free space in transmit FIFOs, therefore division doesn't depend on MAC addresses of
aggregated frames.
The application example for 2+0 mode is shown at the Figure 122. The configuration of the most
important GUI pages at LOCATION 1 (provider side) is shown at the figures 123 -128.
This concrete example describes application where AGGREGATE design is selected on both link sides,
modulation is QAM128 in BW 30 MHz and appropriate maximal data speed is about 169 Mbps. The
management access is similar to Example 8 – Basic 1+1 FD protection scheme described on page 115.
Slave and master IDUs are interconnected by means of fiber optic cable connected into ports SFP 1.
Aggregated data traffic is connected into port LAN 1 at master unit. The first portion of aggregation is
directed over channel ETH 1 at master unit with capacity about 170 Mbps, the second portion is
directed over fiber optic (together with low speed management channel) into slave unit and then
through the channel ETH 4 with configured capacity again to 170 Mbps. the whole capacity is a sum of
both capacities, in our example about 340 Mbps. Other traffic channels on master and also on slave
unit can be used in parallel for next independent data transmissions.
The aggregation setting rules correspond with appropriate explanation in chapter Basic port settings –
Design AGGREGATE on page 79.
Main Advantages
–
Simple capacity increasing.
–
No MAC address depend aggregation algorithm.
–
Next independent traffic channels are still available.
–
Automatic protection (no hitless) for aggregated traffic.
Disadvantages
–
Two frequencies must be used or RF signal separation with excellent OMT.
Figure 122: Example 10 – 2+0 aggregation with out-of-band management