•
If route lookup in the EIS routing table fails or if the management port is down, then packets are dropped. The management application
drop counter is incremented.
•
Whenever IP address is assigned to the management port, it is stored in a global variable in the IP stack, which is used for comparison
with the source IP address of the packet.
•
Rest of the response traffic is handled as per existing behavior by doing route lookup in the default routing table. So if the traffic is
destined to the front-end port IP address, the response is sent out by doing a route lookup in the default routing table, which is an
existing behavior.
Consider a sample topology in which ip1 is an address assigned to the management port and ip2 is an address assigned to any of the front
panel port. A and B are end users on the management and front-panel port networks. The OS-initiated traffic for management applications
takes a preference for ip1 as source IP and uses the management network to reach the destination. If the management port is down or the
route lookup in EIS routing table fails, ip2 is the source IP and the front-panel port is used to reach the destination. The fallback route
between the management and data networks is used in such a case. At any given time, end users can access Dell Networking OS
applications using either ip1 or ip2. Return traffic for such end-user-originated sessions destined to management port ip1 is handled using
the EIS route lookup.
Handling of Transit Traffic (Traffic Separation)
This is forwarded traffic where destination IP is not an IP address configured in the switch.
•
Packets received on the management port with destination on the front-end port is dropped.
•
Packets received on the front-end port with destination on the management port is dropped.
•
A separate drop counter is incremented for this case. This counter is viewed using the
netstat
command, like all other IP layer
counters.
Consider a scenario in which ip1 is an address assigned to the management port and ip2 is an address assigned to any of the front panel
port of a switch. End users on the management and front panel port networks are connected. In such an environment, traffic received in
the management port destined on the data port network is dropped and traffic received in the front-end port destined on the management
network is dropped.
Mapping of Management Applications and Traffic Type
The following table summarizes the behavior of applications for various types of traffic when the management egress interface selection
feature is enabled.
Table 19. Mapping of Management Applications and Traffic Type
Traffic type /
Application type
Switch initiated traffic
Switch-destined traffic
Transit Traffic
EIS Management
Application
Management is the preferred egress
port selected based on route lookup
in EIS table. If the management port
is down or the route lookup fails,
packets are dropped.
If source TCP/UDP port matches a management
application and source IP address is management
port IP address, management port is the
preferred egress port selected based on route
lookup in EIS table. If management port is down
or route lookup fails, packets are dropped
Traffic from management
port to data port and
from data port to
management port is
blocked
Non-EIS
management
application
Front-end default route will take
higher precedence over
management default route and SSH
session to an unknown destination
uses the front-end default route
If source TCP/UDP port matches a management
application and the source IP address is a
management port IP address, the management
port is the preferred egress port selected based
on route lookup in EIS table. If the management
Traffic from management
port to data port and
from data port to
management port is
blocked
Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP)
311
Summary of Contents for S3048-ON
Page 1: ...Dell Configuration Guide for the S3048 ON System 9 11 2 5 ...
Page 137: ...0 Gi 1 1 Gi 1 2 rx Flow N A N A 0 0 No N A N A yes Access Control Lists ACLs 137 ...
Page 142: ...Figure 10 BFD Three Way Handshake State Changes 142 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection BFD ...
Page 241: ...Dell Control Plane Policing CoPP 241 ...
Page 287: ... RPM Synchronization GARP VLAN Registration Protocol GVRP 287 ...
Page 428: ...Figure 53 Inspecting the LAG Configuration 428 Link Aggregation Control Protocol LACP ...
Page 477: ...Figure 73 Configuring Interfaces for MSDP Multicast Source Discovery Protocol MSDP 477 ...
Page 478: ...Figure 74 Configuring OSPF and BGP for MSDP 478 Multicast Source Discovery Protocol MSDP ...
Page 483: ...Figure 77 MSDP Default Peer Scenario 2 Multicast Source Discovery Protocol MSDP 483 ...
Page 484: ...Figure 78 MSDP Default Peer Scenario 3 484 Multicast Source Discovery Protocol MSDP ...
Page 745: ...Figure 104 Single and Double Tag TPID Match Service Provider Bridging 745 ...
Page 746: ...Figure 105 Single and Double Tag First byte TPID Match 746 Service Provider Bridging ...