Mitel MiVOICE BUSINESS, Инструкция по инженерии

Страница: 239 / 381

Network Configuration Concepts
225
• 10 IP phones over a T1 link at a remote site.
• Trunk traffic is 65% of all traffic.
• Traffic between remotely located IP phones stays local to the remote site (it does not
traverse the WAN link).
Figure 36: WAN traffic example
Therefore
• The total traffic handled is 60 CCS.
• 3.5 CCS is local traffic.
• WAN traffic is 56.5 CCS = 60–3.5.
A previous calculation showed that a T1 WAN link could handle six G.711 voice channels without
QoS enabled. From ErlangB tables with P.001 blocking, such a link can handle 41.1 CCS. There
is a mismatch between presented traffic and carrying capacity.
Solutions that come from this example can then be covered by:
• Compression (G.729a) to the remote phones can be used to increase the voice channel
capability. However, it also reduces voice quality, which may not be acceptable.
• The WAN link bandwidth can be increased.
Table 64: CCS calculation example
CALCULATION FORMULA RESULT
Remote phones 10
Total CCS at the remote site Remote phones x 6 CCS 60 CCS
Percentage of trunk traffic Total CCS x 65% 39 CCS
Percentage of intercom traffic Total CCS x (100 – trunk traffic)% 21 CCS
Local intercom traffic Intercom traffic x Ratio of local phones / total
phones (21x10/60) 3.5 CCS
Total traffic over the WAN Total traffic – local traffic 56.5 CCS