Krautkramer USM 35X
Issue 01, 04/2005
5-81
Operation
Evaluation according to the DGS method (only USM 35X S)
Locks, error messages
As long as a valid reference echo is stored, no func-
tions can be changed which could cause an incorrect
DGS evaluation. If an attempt is made to change such
a function, the corresponding error message will appear,
e.g.
“P-DELAY locked by DGS-REF = on”
The DGS evaluation must likewise be switched off and
the reference echo deleted in the case of selecting a
new probe, e.g. for a new test application.
Validity of the DGS method
Echo amplitude evaluations according to the DGS
method are only reliable and reproducible in cases
when:
• The reference echo is received from the test object if
possible. If this is not possible, it should be ensured
that the reference block is made of the same materi-
al as the test object.
• The evaluation is carried out using the same probe
which was also used for recording the reference
echo. Another probe of the same type can be used
after recording a new reference echo.
• Echo amplitudes for reflector distances smaller than
half of the probe’s near-field length are subject to
heavy variation – for physical reasons due to interfer-
ence phenomena effecting the area. Thus, evaluation
results may fluctuate more as the usually permissi-
ble ±2 dB. An evaluation according to the DGS
method is possible but not recommended for this
cases.
Krautkramer USM 35X
Issue 01, 04/2005
5-81
Operation
Evaluation according to the DGS method (only USM 35X S)
Locks, error messages
As long as a valid reference echo is stored, no func-
tions can be changed which could cause an incorrect
DGS evaluation. If an attempt is made to change such
a function, the corresponding error message will appear,
e.g.
“P-DELAY locked by DGS-REF = on”
The DGS evaluation must likewise be switched off and
the reference echo deleted in the case of selecting a
new probe, e.g. for a new test application.
Validity of the DGS method
Echo amplitude evaluations according to the DGS
method are only reliable and reproducible in cases
when:
• The reference echo is received from the test object if
possible. If this is not possible, it should be ensured
that the reference block is made of the same materi-
al as the test object.
• The evaluation is carried out using the same probe
which was also used for recording the reference
echo. Another probe of the same type can be used
after recording a new reference echo.
• Echo amplitudes for reflector distances smaller than
half of the probe’s near-field length are subject to
heavy variation – for physical reasons due to interfer-
ence phenomena effecting the area. Thus, evaluation
results may fluctuate more as the usually permissi-
ble ±2 dB. An evaluation according to the DGS
method is possible but not recommended for this
cases.
Summary of Contents for Krautkramer USM 35X
Page 8: ...0 8 Issue 01 04 2005 Krautkramer USM 35X ...
Page 9: ...Krautkramer USM 35X Issue 01 04 2005 1 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 1 ...
Page 20: ...1 12 Issue 01 04 2005 Krautkramer USM 35X ...
Page 27: ...Krautkramer USM 35X Issue 01 04 2005 3 1 Initial start up 3 Initial start up 3 ...
Page 35: ...Krautkramer USM 35X Issue 01 04 2005 4 1 Principles of operation 4 Principles of operation 4 ...
Page 49: ...Krautkramer USM 35X Issue 01 04 2005 5 1 Operation 5 Operation 5 ...
Page 130: ...5 82 Issue 01 04 2005 Krautkramer USM 35X ...
Page 131: ...Krautkramer USM 35X Issue 01 04 2005 6 1 Documentation 6 Documentation 6 ...
Page 135: ...Krautkramer USM 35X Issue 01 04 2005 7 1 Maintenance and care 7 Maintenance and care 7 ...
Page 148: ...7 14 Issue 01 04 2005 Krautkramer USM 35X ...
Page 177: ...Krautkramer USM 35X Issue 01 04 2005 9 1 Appendix 9 Appendix 9 ...
Page 190: ...9 14 Issue 01 04 2005 Krautkramer USM 35X ...
Page 191: ...Krautkramer USM 35X Issue 01 04 2005 10 1 Changes 10 Changes 10 ...
Page 193: ...Krautkramer USM 35X Issue 01 04 2005 11 1 Index 11 Index 11 ...