![Carpenter MFG. Co., Inc. Compu-Strip 75 Operator'S Manual Download Page 45](http://html.mh-extra.com/html/carpenter-mfg-co-inc/compu-strip-75/compu-strip-75_operators-manual_2559644045.webp)
Carpenter Model 75 Compu-Strip®
Carpenter Model 75 Compu
-
Strip
®
•
Phone
: (315) 682-
9176 •
Fax
: (315) 682-9160
Website
: www.carpentermfg.com •
Revised June 10
th
, 2019
Page 45
Step 2
Step 3
STRIP
0.400
0.650
PULL
(
Length
)
0.000
0.650
LENGTH S
3
3
CUT
0.115
0.135
CUT S
1
2
DWELL
1.0
0.2
PULL
(
dia
.)
0.120
0.140
HOLD
0.166
---- (OFF)
18. Notice that the
PULL
length value for Step 2 is set to 0.000. It is common
practice to set the
PULL
length
value for the dielectric cut to zero if the
PULL
length value of the next step is set for a full strip. In this example, the Step 3
PULL
length value is set for a full strip. When the slug from Step 3 is pulled, it
will also pull-off the slug left in Step 2. This saves some time during the strip
cycle.
19. The value entered in the
CUT
field of Step 2 is the diameter of the dielectric that
is measured with the dial calipers. The measured diameter values of a cable are
typically used as the initial programming values when setting up a strip program.
They are, however, seldom the optimum programmed values.
Note
: It is important to note that, due to the operating characteristics of an
orbiting blade stripper, the final programmed cut diameters that give the desired
strip quality may not correspond with the actual measured values of the cable.
This is quite normal and not a sign that there is a problem with the Model 75.
This is especially true in the case of dielectric strips, where the optimum
programmed
CUT
value is typically less than the actual measured diameter of
the dielectric.
20. After entering all of the required data as above, press
. The run screen will
be displayed and the unit is ready to process cables.
22. Check the strip quality and make any necessary changes by entering edit mode
as in step 3 above; edit the required data fields.
23. For the example described here, the table below shows the final programming
data that produced the optimum strip. Notice the differences from our originally
programmed values (Figure 4-5) and our optimum values (Figure 4-6). Changed
values are highlighted in Figure 4-6.