Afag SE-Power FS, Руководство пользователя

Страница: 45 / 60

SE-Power FS STO-manual vers. 1.6 en.12.08.2015 45
No. Questions Correct Completed
1. Has a risk assessment been conducted? Yes

No


2. Have an error list and a validation plan been drawn up? Yes

No


3.
Was the validation plan, including analysis and inspection,
processed and a validation report compiled?
The validation procedure must include the following
inspections as a minimum:
Yes

No
 
a) Component check: Is the SE-Power FS used with the
FSM 2.0
– STO (inspection using the rating plates)
Yes

No


b) Is the wiring correct (check against the wiring diagram)? Yes

No



Have any short-circuit bypasses been removed?
Yes

No



Has a safety switching device been wired to X40?
Yes

No



Is the safety switching device certified and wired in
accordance with the application’s requirements?
Yes

No
 
c) Functional inspections:
Yes

No



Pressing the emergency stop button on the unit. Is the
drive shut down?
Yes

No



If only STO-A is activated - is the drive shut down
immediately and the “discrepancy time violation” error
(Display 52-1) reported in the SE-Power FS after the
discrepancy time has lapsed?
Yes

No
 

If only STO-B is activated - is the drive shut down
immediately and the “discrepancy time violation” error
(Display 52-1) reported in the SE-Power FS after the
discrepancy time has lapsed?
Yes

No
 

Is a short circuit detected between STO-A and STO-B or
has a suitable fault exclusion been defined?
Yes

No



Only when using a safety switching device with analysis
of the feedback contact C1/C2:
Is the drive shut down on a short-circuit from C1 to C2?
Yes

No



Is a restart inhibited? I.e. no movement occurs when the
emergency stop button is pressed and the enable signals
are active unless a start command is acknowledged
beforehand.
Yes

No


Table 10: Questions for validation in accordance with EN ISO 13849-1 and 2 (example)