
Echometer Company
Model – H Manual
Phone: (940) 767-4334
5001 Ditto Lane
Page 52
Fax: (940) 723-7507
Wichita Falls, Texas 76302, U.S.A.
E-Mail:
The following table compares the result from the anomaly marker analysis with the initial analysis that was
performed using the
Automatic Analysis
option:
Variable
Automatic Liquid Level Depth
Method
Anomaly Marker Liquid Level
Depth Analysis
Liquid Level depth
7098
6082
Joints to Liquid Level
223.91
191.85
Average jts/sec
20.73
17.76
Average jt length (ft)
31.70
31.70
Time to Liquid, sec
10.803
10.803
Average Acoustic Velocity
ft/sec
1314
1126
In this example there is a very large difference in the resulting number of joints to the liquid level, the liquid level
depth, the average acoustic velocity and number of joints per second.
Assuming that the depths to the downhole markers were entered correctly in the well data, then the Anomaly
Marker Analysis yields the most accurate calculation of the distance to the liquid level and shows that this new
method is a major improvement over the existing automatic method for processing fluid level depth, and should
always be used when echoes from downhole anomalies are visible in the acoustic trace.
Pressing the
Continue
button, the user is given the option of saving the acoustic record analysis or of discarding
the changes.