313
127.0.0.0/8 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
127.0.0.1/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
# Execute the display ip routing-table command on CE 5 and CE 6 to verify that the routing tables
contain routes of remote sub-VPNs. The following takes CE 5 for illustration.
[CE5] display ip routing-table
Routing Tables: Public
Destinations : 5 Routes : 5
Destination/Mask Proto Pre Cost NextHop Interface
110.1.1.0/24 Direct 0 0 110.1.1.1 Vlan1
110.1.1.1/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
127.0.0.0/8 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
127.0.0.1/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
130.1.1.0/24 BGP 255 0 110.1.1.2 Vlan1
# CE 3 and CE 4 can ping each other successfully.
[CE3] ping 120.1.1.1
PING 120.1.1.1: 56 data bytes, press CTRL_C to break
Reply from 120.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=1 ttl=252 time=102 ms
Reply from 120.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=2 ttl=252 time=69 ms
Reply from 120.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=3 ttl=252 time=105 ms
Reply from 120.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=4 ttl=252 time=88 ms
Reply from 120.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=5 ttl=252 time=87 ms
--- 120.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
5 packet(s) transmitted
5 packet(s) received
0.00% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 69/90/105 ms
# CE5 and CE 6 can ping each other successfully.
[CE5] ping 130.1.1.1
PING 130.1.1.1: 56 data bytes, press CTRL_C to break
Reply from 130.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=1 ttl=252 time=102 ms
Reply from 130.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=2 ttl=252 time=69 ms
Reply from 130.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=3 ttl=252 time=105 ms
Reply from 130.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=4 ttl=252 time=88 ms
Reply from 130.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=5 ttl=252 time=87 ms
--- 130.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
5 packet(s) transmitted
5 packet(s) received
0.00% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 69/90/105 ms
# CE 3 and CE 6 cannot ping each other.
[CE3] ping 130.1.1.1