BERTHOLD TECHNOLOGIES Uni-Probe LB 490, Руководство пользователя

Страница: 77 / 730

Uni-Probe LB 490
BERTHOLD TECHNOLOGIES GmbH & Co. KG
1 – 77
Volume 1 9 Functional Safety
1
©
exida.com
GmbH
berthold 0408-10 r003 v1r3.doc, Apr. 12, 2007
Rainer Faller
Page 9 of 18
3.2 Measuring
principle
Figure 2 gives an overview of the measuring principle of the Level Transmitter LB490 Uni-Probe. Figure 2: Measuring principle of the Level Transmitter LB490 Uni-Probe
Explanation of terms: Strahlenquelle:
Capsulated and shielded Gamma radiation source mounted outside the vessel at the level to be monitored
Messsystem:
Radiation detector mounted opposite to the source
Ausgang:
4..20mA NAMUR NE43 compliant output
The Level Switch system is based on the physical law of the
attenuation
of
Gamma
radiation
as
it passes through medium. Product in between the source and
the
corresponding
detector
decreases the detected radiation by a related extent. This effect
corresponds
to
the
relative
product's
presence
and
therewith
it
signalizes
the level of the product in the container (vessel,
pipe, etc.). As
it is a contact-less measurement with external mounting without modification of the existing
vessel, the measurement is independent of:
x
High temperature with water-cooling
x
High pressure or vacuum
x
Volatile & biohazard material
x
Corrosive material
x
Agitators, baffles, coils etc.
x
Build up on vessel walls
x
Physical and chemical properties of the product and the process
Berthold
Technologies main detector properties are designed according to the patented method
of
automatic
drift stabilization for radiometric applications, this method uses the energy loss of
natural cosmic radiation for readjustment of
the
amplification
for
measurement
result
corrections. (See also Patent scripture DE 41 14030 C1)
©
exida.com
GmbH
berthold 0408-10 r003 v1r3.doc, Apr. 12, 2007
Rainer Faller
Page 10 of 18
4
Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostics Analy
sis
The
Failure
Modes,
Effects, and Diagnostic Analysis was done together with Berthold
Technology
and
is
documented in [R1] to [R3]. When the effect of a certain failure mode could
not
be
analyzed
theoretically, the failure modes were introduced on component level and the
effects of these failure modes were examined on system level (see [D7] – Fault insertion
tests).
This resulted in failures that can be classified according to the following failure categories.
4.1
Description of the failure categories
In order to judge the failure behavior of the Level Transmitter LB490 Uni-Probe, the
following
definitions for the failure of the product were considered. Fail-Safe
State
The fail-safe state is defined as the current contact reaching the NAMUR NE43 Alarm ranges, i.e., I < 3,6mA or I > 21mA.
Fail
Safe
A safe failure (S) is defined as a failure that causes the transmitter to
go
to
the
defined
fail-safe state without a demand from the
process. Safe failures are divided into safe detected (SD)
and
safe
undetected (SU) failures.
Fail
Dangerous
A
dangerous
failure
(D) is defined as a failure that does not
correctly
respond
to
a
demand
from the process outside a band of
more than 5% full span at ambient temperature.
Fail
Dangerous
Undetected
Failure that is dangerous and that is not
being
diagnosed
by
internal diagnostics.
Fail
Dangerous
Detected
Failure that is dangerous but is detected by
internal
diagnostics
or
a
connected
logic solver (These failures may be converted to the
selected fail-safe state).
Annunciation
Failure,
e.g.
in a diagnostic circuit, that does not directly impact
safety but impacts the ability to detect a future fault. Annunciation failures are divided into annunciation detected (AD)
and
annunciation undetected (AU) failures. For the calculation of
the
Safe Failure Fraction (SFF), they are treated like dangerous failures. This is a worst-case interpretation.
No
Effect
failures
Failure
of
a
component
that is part of the safety function but has
no
effect
on the safety function within a band of not more than 5%
full span. For the calculation of the Safe
Failure
Fraction
(SFF),
it
is treated like a safe undetected failure.
The
failure categories listed above expand on the categories listed in IEC 61508 which are only
safe
and
dangerous,
both
detected and undetected. The reason for this is that not all failure
modes
have
effects
that can be accurately classified according to the failure categories listed in
IEC 61508. “No Effect” and “Annunciation” failures are provided for those who wish to do reliability
modeling
more
detailed
than
required by IEC 61508. In IEC 61508:2000, “No Effect” failures are defined
as safe undetected failures even though they will not cause the safety function to go to a safe state. Therefore they need to be considered in the Safe Failure Fraction calculation.