REFERENCES
77
1
2015 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and
Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
Circulation
2015; 132: S315-S573
2
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015,
Resuscitation.
2015;95:1-311.
3
Larsen A, Hjörnevik Å, Bonarjee V, et al. Coronary blood flow and perfusion pressure
during coronary angiography in patients with ongoing mechanical chest compression:
A report on 6 cases.
Resuscitation.
81.(2010)493–497.
4
Wagner H, Madsen Hardig B, Harnek J, et al. Aspects on resuscitation in the
coronary interventional catheter laboratory.
Circulation.
2010;122:A91 (Poster on file at
Physio-Control.)
5
Liao Q, Sjöberg T, Paskevicius A, et al. Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary
resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.
2010;10:53 (open access; http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/10/53).
6
Wagner H, Madsen Hardig B, Steen S, et al. Evaluation of coronary blood flow
velocity during cardiac arrest with circulation maintained through mechanical chest
compressions in a porcine model.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
. 2011;11:73.
7
2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and
Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.
Resuscitation.
2005;67:195.
8
Smekal D, Johansson J, Huzevka T, et al. No difference in autopsy detected injuries
in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with
mechanical compressions with the LUCAS device – a pilot study.
Resuscitation.
2009;80:1104-1107.
9
Oberladstaetter D, Braun P, Freund M, et al. Autopsy is more sensitive than
computed tomography in detection of LUCAS-CPR related non-dislocated chest
fractures.
Resuscitation.
2012;83(3):e89-90.
10 Mateos Rodríguez A, Navalpotro Pascual J, Peinado Vallejo F, et al. Lung injuries
secondary to mechanical chest compressions.
Resuscitation.
2012;83(10):e203.
11 Menzies D, Barton D, Nolan N. Does the LUCAS device increase injury during CPR?
Resuscitation.
2010;81S:S20. AS076.
12 Yost D, Gonzales L, Lick C, et al. Abstract 38: North American LUCAS Evaluation:
prehospital use of a mechanical chest compression system.
Circulation
. 2010;122.
A38. (Poster on file at Physio-Control.)
13 Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, et al. Mechanical chest compressions and
simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest: The LINC Randomized Trial.
JAMA.
2014;311:53-6.
14 Vanden Hoek T, Morrison L, Shuster M, et al. Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special
Situations: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary
Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
Circulation.
2010;122(18
suppl 3). (S834).
15 2010 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
Circulation.
2010; 122: S640-S946
Содержание LUCAS 3
Страница 2: ...2 LUCAS 3 Chest Compression System Instructor Guidebook ...
Страница 4: ......
Страница 6: ......
Страница 8: ......
Страница 9: ...Chapter 1 Instructor Training Preparation ...
Страница 10: ......
Страница 14: ......
Страница 15: ...Chapter 2 Classroom Training Introduction and Overview ...
Страница 16: ......
Страница 36: ......
Страница 37: ...Chapter 3 Small Group Hands on Training and Application Practice ...
Страница 38: ......
Страница 47: ...3 SMALL GROUP HANDS ON TRAINING AND APPLICATION PRACTICE 47 ...
Страница 48: ......
Страница 49: ...Chapter 4 Training Evaluation ...
Страница 50: ......
Страница 52: ......
Страница 53: ...Appendix A Important Contacts ...
Страница 54: ......
Страница 56: ......
Страница 57: ...Appendix B Frequently Asked Questions ...
Страница 58: ......
Страница 66: ......
Страница 67: ...Appendix C The LUCAS Device in the Cath Lab ...
Страница 68: ......
Страница 74: ......
Страница 75: ...References ...
Страница 76: ......
Страница 79: ......