Hologic ThinPrep, Руководство оператора

Страница: 24 / 230

MAN-08723-001 Rev. 001 page 20 of 28
Agreement among Laboratory Cytotechnologists/Pathologists
The following tables indicate the extent to which the laboratory Cytotechnologists/Pathologists at a
given site agreed amongst themselves on the diagnosis, comparing the Imager-assisted review to the
manual review. Tables are provided for ASC-US+ and ASC-H+. Note that since one site had only
two CT/Pathologist pairs, the three-way agreement analysis is available for just two sites, with 840
total specimens.
In Table 21 for ASC-H+, the number of specimens is shown for which various levels of agreement
among the CTs occurred. Either all three CTs rated the slide as positive (ASC-H+), two out of three
rated it positive, one out of three, or none of them.
Table 21: Laboratory Cytotechnologist/Pathologist Agreement, All Results, ASC-H+
ASC-H+
Manual Review
Three lab CTs have read the same slide
Totals
Three CTs
had
ASC-H+
Two CTs had
ASC-H+
& one had
<ASC-H
One CT had
ASC-H+
& two had
<ASC-H
Three
CTs had
<ASC-H
Imager-
Assisted
Review
Three lab
CTs have
read the
same slide
Three CTs had
ASC-H+
91 23 8 0 122
Two CTs had ASC-H+
and one had <ASC-H
12 21 7 8 48
One CT had ASC-H+
and two had <ASC-H
3 12 16 11 42
Three CTs had
<ASC-H
0 2 22 604 628
Totals
106 58 53 623 840
ASC-H+
Manual Review
Three lab CTs have read the same slide
Totals
Three or two CTs
had ASC-H+
Three or two CTs
had <ASC-H
Imager-
Assisted
Review
Three lab
CTs have
read the
same slide
Three or two CTs had
ASC-H+
147 23 170
Three or two CTs had
<ASC-H
17 653 670
Totals
164 676 840