background image

 

D1044 

- SIL 2 - SIL 3  Digital Relay Output 

G.M. International ISM0080-10 

Description: 

Input Signal from PLC/DCS is normally High (24 Vdc) and is applied to pins 3-4 and 5-6 in order to Normally Energize (NE) or Normally De-energize (ND) load. 
For NE load, the Input Signal from PLC/DCS is Low (0 Vdc) during “de-energized to trip” operation, in order to de-energize the load. 
For ND load, the Input Signal from PLC/DCS is Low (0 Vdc) during “de-energized to trip” operation, in order to energize the load. 
The following table describes the status (open or closed) of each output contact when the input signal is High or Low for both NE and ND loads. 

 

Safety Function and Failure behavior:

  

D1044S is considered to be operating in Low Demand mode, as a Type A module, having Hardware Fault Tolerance (HFT) = 0. 
The failure behaviour of D1044S is described by the following definitions: 

 

fail-Safe State: it is defined as the relay being de-energized (so that the NO-COM contact is open and the NC-COM contact is closed); 

 f

ail Safe: failure mode that causes the module / (sub)system to go to the defined Fail-Safe state without a demand from the process; 

 f

ail Dangerous: failure mode that does not respond to a demand from the process (i.e. being unable to go to the defined fail-safe state), so that the relay remains 

  energized (that is, the NO-COM contact remains closed and the NC-COM contact remains open); 

 f

ail “No Effect”: failure mode of a component that plays a part in implementing the safety function but that is neither a safe failure nor a dangerous failure.  

When calculating the SFF, this failure mode is not taken into account; 

 

fail “Not part”: failure mode of a component that is not part of the safety function but part of the circuit diagram and is listed for completeness.  

When calculating the SFF, this failure mode is not taken into account.  

Failure rate date: taken from Siemens Standard SN29500. 

 

Failure rate table:

 

 

Failure rates table according to IEC 61508:2010 Ed.2 : 

 

PFDavg vs T[Proof] table 

(assuming Proof Test coverage of 99%), with determination of SIL supposing module contributes 

10%  of total SIF dangerous failures: 

 

PFDavg vs T[Proof] table

 (assuming Proof Test coverage of 99%), with determination of SIL supposing module contributes >10% of total SIF dangerous failures: 

 

Systematic capability SIL 3.

 

 

Operation

 

Input Signal

 

Pins 3-4 and 5-6

 

Pins

 

13/14 - 15

 

Pins

 

15 – 16

 

NE Load (SIL2)

 

Pins 15 - -Vload

 

ND Load (SIL2)

 

Pins 15 - -Vload

 

Normal 

High (24 Vdc) 

Closed Open 

Energized 

De-Energized 

Trip 

Low (0 Vdc) 

Open 

Closed De-Energized  Energized 

 

Failure category

 

Failure rates (FIT)

 

λ

dd

 = Total Dangerous Detected failures 

0.00 

λ

du

 = Total Dangerous Undetected failures 

32.00 

λ

sd

 = Total Safe Detected failures 

0.00 

λ

su

 = Total Safe Undetected failures 

131.72 

λ

tot safe

 = Total Failure Rate (Safety Function) = 

λ

dd

 + 

λ

du

 + 

λ

sd

 + 

λ

su

 

163.72

 

MTBF (safety function, single channel) = (1 / 

λ

tot safe

) + MTTR (8 hours)

 

697 years

 

λ

no effect

 = “No effect” failures 

106.08 

λ

not part

 = “Not Part” failures 

2.00 

λ

tot device

 = Total Failure Rate (Device) = 

λ

tot safe

 + 

λ

no effect

 + 

λ

not part

 

271.80

 

MTBF (device, single channel) = (1 / 

λ

tot device

) + MTTR (8 hours)

 

420 years

 

λ

sd

 

λ

su

 

λ

dd

 

λ

du

 

SFF

 

0.00 FIT 

131.72 FIT 

0.00 FIT 

32.00 FIT 

80.45% 

T[Proof] = 1 year

 

T[Proof] = 7 years

 

PFDavg = 1.40 E-04 - Valid for 

SIL 2

 

PFDavg = 9.83 E-04 - Valid for 

SIL 2

 

T[Proof] = 10 years

 

PFDavg = 1.40 E-03 - Valid for 

SIL 2

 

Functional Safety Manual and Applications 

Application D1044S - 

with Loop Powered Mode 

 

2) 

 

Normal state operation 

De-energized to trip operation 

13/14 

PLC 

Output signal 

ON - 24 Vdc 

 

15 

SIL 2 
NE Load 

+ V load 

- V load 

16 

13/14 

PLC 

Output signal 

OFF - 0 Vdc 

 

15 

+ V load 

- V load 

16 

SIL 2 Normally Energized Relay Condition for ND Load

 

Normal state operation 

De-energized to trip operation 

16 

PLC 

Output signal 

ON - 24 Vdc 

 

15 

+ V load 

- V load 

13/14 

16 

PLC 

Output signal 

OFF - 0 Vdc 

 

15 

+ V load 

- V load 

13/14 

SIL 2 Normally Energized Relay Condition for NE Load

 

SIL 2 
NE Load 

SIL 2 
ND Load 

SIL 2 
ND Load 

Содержание D1044D

Страница 1: ...D1044 SIL 2 SIL 3 Digital Relay Output ISM0080 10 D1044S D1044D INSTRUCTION SAFETY MANUAL SIL 2 SIL 3 Digital Relay Output Loop Bus Powered DIN Rail Models D1044S D1044D...

Страница 2: ...nel D1044S Isolation Test Voltage I S Out In 1 5 KV I S Out Supply 1 5 KV I S Out I S Out 500 V In Supply 500 V In In 500 V Input switch contact logic level Trip voltage levels OFF status 1 0 V ON sta...

Страница 3: ...Input Output Supply EMC Compatibility to EN61000 6 2 EN61000 6 4 EN61326 1 ATEX IECEx FM FM C INMETRO EAC EX UKR n 898 T V Certifications T V Functional Safety Certification Type Approval Certificate...

Страница 4: ...hat maximum allowable voltage current Ui Vmax Ii Imax of the D1044 Associated Apparatus are not exceeded by the safety parameters Uo Voc Io Isc of the Intrinsically Safe device indicated in the table...

Страница 5: ...D1044D Bus powered independent channels NC 16 3 4 5 6 Supply 24 Vdc SIL 2 Out 1 7 8 NO 13 14 COM 15 NC 12 NO 9 10 COM 11 In 1 Control SIL 2 Out 2 In 2 Control MODEL D1044D Bus powered 1oo2 channel ar...

Страница 6: ...AZARDOUS LOCATIONS CLASS I DIVISION 2 GROUPS A B C D T Code T4 CLASS I ZONE 2 GROUP IIC T4 Relay contact shown in de energized position MODEL D1044D Loop powered 1oo2 channel architecture NC 16 3 4 5...

Страница 7: ...OUPS E F G CLASS III DIVISION 1 CLASS I ZONE 0 GROUP IIC SAFE AREA ZONE 2 GROUP IIC T4 NON HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS CLASS I DIVISION 2 GROUPS A B C D T Code T4 CLASS I ZONE 2 GROUP IIC T4 MODEL D1044S Bus...

Страница 8: ...lure mode is not taken into account fail Not part failure mode of a component that is not part of the safety function but part of the circuit diagram and is listed for completeness When calculating th...

Страница 9: ...Failure rate date taken from Siemens Standard SN29500 Failure rate table Failure rates table according to IEC 61508 2010 Ed 2 PFDavg vs T Proof table assuming Proof Test coverage of 99 with determinat...

Страница 10: ...N29500 Failure rate table Failure rates table according to IEC 61508 2010 Ed 2 PFDavg vs T Proof table assuming Proof Test coverage of 99 with determination of SIL supposing module contributes 10 of t...

Страница 11: ...ken into account Failure rate date taken from Siemens Standard SN29500 Failure rate table Failure rates table according to IEC 61508 2010 Ed 2 PFDavg vs T Proof table assuming Proof Test coverage of 9...

Страница 12: ...Siemens Standard SN29500 Failure rate table Failure rates table according to IEC 61508 2010 Ed 2 PFDavg vs T Proof table assuming Proof Test coverage of 99 with determination of SIL supposing module c...

Страница 13: ...connections or another acceptable Division 2 Zone 2 wiring method according to the NEC and the CEC Not to be connected to control equipment that uses or generates more than 250 Vrms or Vdc with respe...

Страница 14: ...nsistent with the effective operating environment of the specific installation Units must be protected against dirt dust extreme mechanical e g vibration impact and shock and thermal stress and casual...

Отзывы: