These matrix elements are very nearly identical to the elements in the ’89 patent.
Consider the case when a strong signal pans from left to rear. The ‘89 elements were
designed so that there is complete cancellation of the output from the front left output
only when this signal is fully to the rear (cs = -45, lr = 0). However in a Logic 7 decoder
it would be desirable that the output from the left front output should be zero when the
encoded signal reaches the left rear direction (cs = -22.5 and lr = 22.5). The left front
output should remain at zero as the signal pans further to full rear. The matrix elements
used in March 1997, – the ones above – result in the output in the front left channel being
about –9dB when a signal is panned to the left rear position. This level difference is
sufficient for good performance of the matrix, but it is not as good as it could be.
This performance can be improved by altering the LFL and LFR matrix elements in the
left rear quadrant. Notice that here we are concerned with how the matrix elements vary
along the boundary between left and rear. The mathematical method given in the AES
paper can be used to find the behavior of the elements along the boundary. Let us assume
that the amplitude of the left front output should decrease with the function F(t) as t
varies from 0 (left) to –22.5 degrees (left rear). The method gives the matrix elements
LFL = cos(t)*F(t) -+ sin(t)*(sqrt(1-F(t)^2))
LFR = -(sin(t)*F(t) +- cos(t)*(sqrt(1-F(t)^2)))
If we choose F(t) = cos(4*t) and choose the correct sign, these simplify to
LFL = cos(t)*cos(4*t)+sin(t)*sin(4*t)
LFR = -(sin(t)*cos(4*t)-cos(t)*sin*4*t)
See Figure 7.
Figure 7: The behavior of LFL and LFR along
the rear boundary between left and full rear.
(The slight glitch is due to the absence of a
point at 22.5 degrees.)