160
192.168.1.2 4 65001 4 5 0 00:02:13 Established 0
Ping CE 2 on CE 1 and vice versa to test connectivity.
[CE1] ping 192.168.2.2
PING 192.168.2.2: 56 data bytes, press CTRL_C to break
Reply from 192.168.2.2: bytes=56 Sequence=1 ttl=253 time=61 ms
Reply from 192.168.2.2: bytes=56 Sequence=2 ttl=253 time=54 ms
Reply from 192.168.2.2: bytes=56 Sequence=3 ttl=253 time=53 ms
Reply from 192.168.2.2: bytes=56 Sequence=4 ttl=253 time=57 ms
Reply from 192.168.2.2: bytes=56 Sequence=5 ttl=253 time=36 ms
--- 192.168.2.2 ping statistics ---
5 packet(s) transmitted
5 packet(s) received
0.00% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 36/52/61 ms
[CE2] ping 192.168.1.2
PING 192.168.1.2: 56 data bytes, press CTRL_C to break
Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=56 Sequence=1 ttl=253 time=38 ms
Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=56 Sequence=2 ttl=253 time=61 ms
Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=56 Sequence=3 ttl=253 time=74 ms
Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=56 Sequence=4 ttl=253 time=36 ms
Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=56 Sequence=5 ttl=253 time=35 ms
--- 192.168.1.2 ping statistics ---
5 packet(s) transmitted
5 packet(s) received
0.00% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 35/48/74 ms
The output shows that CE 1 and CE 2 can reach each other.
7.
Verify the configuration:
# Execute the
display mpls lsp verbose
command on PE 1. The output shows that an LSP with
LspIndex 2050 is established using RSVP-TE, meaning that the LSP is an MPLS TE tunnel.
[PE1] display mpls lsp verbose
------------------------------------------------------------------
LSP Information: RSVP LSP
------------------------------------------------------------------
No : 1
IngressLsrID : 2.2.2.2
LocalLspID : 1
Tunnel-Interface : Tunnel1
Fec : 3.3.3.3/32
Nexthop : 10.0.0.2
In-Label : NULL
Out-Label : 1024
In-Interface : ----------
Out-Interface : Vlan-interface2
LspIndex : 2050
Tunnel ID : 0x22004
LsrType : Ingress
Bypass In Use : Not Exists