Magnetrol Jupiter JM4 Safety Manual Download Page 10

10

 

ORI-652 Jupiter

®

 Model JM4 Magnetostrictive Transmitter – SIL Safety Manual

Step Action

5

Use the “DIAGNOSTICS” menu to observe the present Echo Curve and document typical per-

formance values.  Confirm that the ECHO Waveform is normal.  The ECHO curve is dependent 

on the probe used and the level of the process on the probe.  It is recommended that a typical 

ECHO curve be saved at commissioning. Comparison of the ECHO curve at proof test to one 

stored at the time of commissioning gives additional confidence of the normal operation of the 

unit.  Use of digital communications (HART enhanced DD or DTM) is necessary for comparison 

of echo curves.  For a dual float unit repeat the steps below for the second float and document 

“Upr Echo Strength” and “Ifc Echo Strength” as well as “Upr Noise / Threshold” and  “Ifc Noise / 

Threshold”. 

a.) Move the process level so the float is located at a distance of approximately 33% of probe 

length from the connector end of the probe. 

b.) Choose the menu “DIAGNOSTICS/ECHO CURVES/ View Echo Curve”.

i.)  Observe the present Echo Curve, identify the characteristic portions of the waveform 

related to the top of the probe and float location.  

ii.)  Confirm signal from the float appears normal and is located as expected.

iii.) Verify the baseline of the waveform is normal and does not have evidence of excessive 

noise.

iv.) If possible, compare to Echo curve from commissioning to assure that performance has 

not changed significantly. 

c.)  Choose the menu “DIAGNOSTICS/ADVANCED DIAGNOSTICS/ INTERNAL VALUES”.

i.)  Observe and record:

 

 

 

 

 

Upper   

    Interface                 

  

1. Echo Strength                    __________  ___________

            2. Lvl Noise / Threshold         __________  ___________

ii.)  Confirm that these values match the values observed at commissioning of the unit and/

or at previous Proof Tests. 

            1. Echo Strength change is less than ±15.

            2. Lvl Noise / Threshold is less than ±15. 

6

Perform a two point calibration check of the transmitter by applying level to two points on the 

probe and compare the transmitter display reading and the current level value to a know refer-

ence measurement. 

7

If the calibration is correct the proof test is complete. Proceed to step 9.

8

If the calibration is incorrect, remove the transmitter and probe from the process.  Inspect the 

probe for buildup or clogging. Clean the probe if necessary.  Perform a bench calibration check 

by moving the float to two points on the probe. Measure the level from the bottom of the probe 

to the points and compare to the transmitter display and current level readings.

a.) If calibration is off by more than 1%, call the factory for assistance.

b.) If calibration is correct, the proof test is complete.  Re-install the probe and transmitter and 

proceed to step 9.

9

Restore the loop to full operation.

10

Remove the bypass from the safety PLC or otherwise restore normal operation. 

Summary of Contents for Jupiter JM4

Page 1: ...oftware v1 x Magnetostrictive Level Transmitter This manual complements and is intended to be used with the Orion Instruments Jupiter Model JM4 Magnetostrictive Level Transmitter Installation and Oper...

Page 2: ...lation 6 5 3 Skill Level of Personnel 6 5 4 Necessary Tools 6 5 5 Configuration 6 5 5 1 General 6 5 5 2 Configuration 7 5 5 3 Write Protecting Locking 7 5 6 Site Acceptance Testing 7 5 7 Recording Res...

Page 3: ...section of the wire alloy This in turn creates a vibratory disturbance which begins to travel through the wire at a very constant rate of speed The disturbance is later detected via a sensing device...

Page 4: ...operly under the low alarm condition The only unsafe mode is when the unit is reading an incorrect level within the 4 20 mA range 2 deviation MAGNETROL defines a safe failure as one in which the 4 20...

Page 5: ...e Description Files is also required if HART is used Manufacturer Code 56 hex Model JM4 Device ID 56DF hex device revision 1 DD revision 1 For device installations in a classified area the relevant sa...

Page 6: ...NOTE This SIL evaluation has assumed that the customer will be able to acknowledge an over or undercurrent condition via the Logic Solver 5 3 Skill Level of Personnel Personnel following the procedure...

Page 7: ...9 999 NOTE Default Password 0 Password disabled Refer to the Model JM4 Installation and Operating Manual Bulletin ORI 650 for additional information on password pro tection It is required that after c...

Page 8: ...o maintain the appropriate Safety Integrity Level of a Safety Instrumented System it is imperative that the entire system be tested at regular time intervals shown as TI in the appropriate standards T...

Page 9: ...esent Status Present Status should be OK b Review the EVENT HISTORY i Messages in the EVENT HISTORY must be investigated and understood ii Corrective actions should be taken for critical messages that...

Page 10: ...have evidence of excessive noise iv If possible compare to Echo curve from commissioning to assure that performance has not changed significantly c Choose the menu DIAGNOSTICS ADVANCED DIAGNOSTICS IN...

Page 11: ...e manufacturer that the level transmitter Magnetostrictive 4 20 mA Model JM4 511x xxx is suitable for the use in safety instrumented systems according to IEC 61511 1 if the safety instructions and fol...

Page 12: ...12 ORI 652 Jupiter Model JM4 Magnetostrictive Transmitter SIL Safety Manual...

Page 13: ...IL 2 HFT 0 Single Float SFF 93 1 PFDavg 1 97E 03 Dual Float SFF 91 9 PFDavg 1 96E 03 Proof Test Interval Annually refer to PFD Graph below 7 4 PFD Graph The resulting PVDAVG Graph generated from the e...

Page 14: ...Lifetime of Critical Components According to section 7 4 9 5 of IEC 61508 2 a useful lifetime based on experience should be assumed Although a constant failure rate is assumed by probabilistic estima...

Page 15: ...Safety Related Systems ANSI ISA 84 00 01 2004 Part 1 IEC 61511 1Mod Func tional Safety Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Indus try Sector Part 1 Hardware and Software Requirements ANSI ISA 8...

Page 16: ...ry inspection finds the cause of the claim to be covered under the warranty If the trouble is the result of conditions beyond our control or is NOT covered by the warranty there will be charges for la...

Reviews: