REFERENCES
77
1
2015 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and
Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
Circulation
2015; 132: S315-S573
2
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015,
Resuscitation.
2015;95:1-311.
3
Larsen A, Hjörnevik Å, Bonarjee V, et al. Coronary blood flow and perfusion pressure
during coronary angiography in patients with ongoing mechanical chest compression:
A report on 6 cases.
Resuscitation.
81.(2010)493–497.
4
Wagner H, Madsen Hardig B, Harnek J, et al. Aspects on resuscitation in the
coronary interventional catheter laboratory.
Circulation.
2010;122:A91 (Poster on file at
Physio-Control.)
5
Liao Q, Sjöberg T, Paskevicius A, et al. Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary
resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.
2010;10:53 (open access; http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/10/53).
6
Wagner H, Madsen Hardig B, Steen S, et al. Evaluation of coronary blood flow
velocity during cardiac arrest with circulation maintained through mechanical chest
compressions in a porcine model.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
. 2011;11:73.
7
2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and
Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.
Resuscitation.
2005;67:195.
8
Smekal D, Johansson J, Huzevka T, et al. No difference in autopsy detected injuries
in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with
mechanical compressions with the LUCAS device – a pilot study.
Resuscitation.
2009;80:1104-1107.
9
Oberladstaetter D, Braun P, Freund M, et al. Autopsy is more sensitive than
computed tomography in detection of LUCAS-CPR related non-dislocated chest
fractures.
Resuscitation.
2012;83(3):e89-90.
10 Mateos Rodríguez A, Navalpotro Pascual J, Peinado Vallejo F, et al. Lung injuries
secondary to mechanical chest compressions.
Resuscitation.
2012;83(10):e203.
11 Menzies D, Barton D, Nolan N. Does the LUCAS device increase injury during CPR?
Resuscitation.
2010;81S:S20. AS076.
12 Yost D, Gonzales L, Lick C, et al. Abstract 38: North American LUCAS Evaluation:
prehospital use of a mechanical chest compression system.
Circulation
. 2010;122.
A38. (Poster on file at Physio-Control.)
13 Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, et al. Mechanical chest compressions and
simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest: The LINC Randomized Trial.
JAMA.
2014;311:53-6.
14 Vanden Hoek T, Morrison L, Shuster M, et al. Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special
Situations: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary
Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
Circulation.
2010;122(18
suppl 3). (S834).
15 2010 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
Circulation.
2010; 122: S640-S946
Summary of Contents for LUCAS 3
Page 2: ...2 LUCAS 3 Chest Compression System Instructor Guidebook ...
Page 4: ......
Page 6: ......
Page 8: ......
Page 9: ...Chapter 1 Instructor Training Preparation ...
Page 10: ......
Page 14: ......
Page 15: ...Chapter 2 Classroom Training Introduction and Overview ...
Page 16: ......
Page 36: ......
Page 37: ...Chapter 3 Small Group Hands on Training and Application Practice ...
Page 38: ......
Page 47: ...3 SMALL GROUP HANDS ON TRAINING AND APPLICATION PRACTICE 47 ...
Page 48: ......
Page 49: ...Chapter 4 Training Evaluation ...
Page 50: ......
Page 52: ......
Page 53: ...Appendix A Important Contacts ...
Page 54: ......
Page 56: ......
Page 57: ...Appendix B Frequently Asked Questions ...
Page 58: ......
Page 66: ......
Page 67: ...Appendix C The LUCAS Device in the Cath Lab ...
Page 68: ......
Page 74: ......
Page 75: ...References ...
Page 76: ......
Page 79: ......