
1-6
Issue 05, 02/00
Krautkramer USN 52R/USN 52L
Effect of temperature variations
The velocity of sound within the test object also varies
as a function of the temperature of the material. This
can cause appreciable errors if the instrument has been
calibrated on a cold calibration block and is then used
on a warm or hot test object. Such errors can be
avoided either by warming the calibration block to the
same temperature before calibrating, or by using a cor-
rection factor obtained from tables.
Measurement of remaining wall thickness
The measurement of the remaining wall thickness on
plant components such as pipes, tanks and reaction
vessels of all types which have been corroded or
eroded from the inside requires a suitable test instru-
ment and special care in handling the probe.
The test operator must be told the nominal wall thick-
nesses and the likely amount of the loss due to erosion
or corrosion.
Assessing flaws using ultrasonics
In present-day test practice there are basically two
methods of assessing flaws.
If the diameter of the sound beam is smaller than the
extent of the flaw, then the beam can be used to scan
the boundaries of the flaw and thus determine its area.
If, however, the diameter of the sound beam is greater
than the size of the flaw, the maximum echo response
from the flaw must be compared with the maximum
echo response from an artificial flaw at the same depth
provided for comparison purposes.
Flaw boundary scanning method
The smaller the diameter of the sound beam from the
probe, the more accurately the determined flaw area
corresponds to the actual flaw area when scanning the
flaw boundaries with the sound beam from a probe.
If, however, the sound beam is relatively broad, the
determined flaw area can substantially differ from the
actual flaw area. Care should therefore be taken to se-
lect a probe which will give a sufficiently narrow beam
at the position of the flaw.
Introduction
Important notes
1-6
Issue 05, 02/00
Krautkramer USN 52R/USN 52L
Effect of temperature variations
The velocity of sound within the test object also varies
as a function of the temperature of the material. This
can cause appreciable errors if the instrument has been
calibrated on a cold calibration block and is then used
on a warm or hot test object. Such errors can be
avoided either by warming the calibration block to the
same temperature before calibrating, or by using a cor-
rection factor obtained from tables.
Measurement of remaining wall thickness
The measurement of the remaining wall thickness on
plant components such as pipes, tanks and reaction
vessels of all types which have been corroded or
eroded from the inside requires a suitable test instru-
ment and special care in handling the probe.
The test operator must be told the nominal wall thick-
nesses and the likely amount of the loss due to erosion
or corrosion.
Assessing flaws using ultrasonics
In present-day test practice there are basically two
methods of assessing flaws.
If the diameter of the sound beam is smaller than the
extent of the flaw, then the beam can be used to scan
the boundaries of the flaw and thus determine its area.
If, however, the diameter of the sound beam is greater
than the size of the flaw, the maximum echo response
from the flaw must be compared with the maximum
echo response from an artificial flaw at the same depth
provided for comparison purposes.
Flaw boundary scanning method
The smaller the diameter of the sound beam from the
probe, the more accurately the determined flaw area
corresponds to the actual flaw area when scanning the
flaw boundaries with the sound beam from a probe.
If, however, the sound beam is relatively broad, the
determined flaw area can substantially differ from the
actual flaw area. Care should therefore be taken to se-
lect a probe which will give a sufficiently narrow beam
at the position of the flaw.
Introduction
Important notes
Summary of Contents for USN 52L
Page 7: ...0 6 Issue 05 02 00 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L ...
Page 8: ...Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L Issue 05 02 00 1 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 1 ...
Page 19: ...1 12 Issue 05 02 00 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L ...
Page 25: ...2 6 Issue 05 02 00 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L ...
Page 32: ...Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L Issue 05 02 00 4 1 Basics of operation 4 Basics of operation 4 ...
Page 45: ...4 14 Issue 05 02 00 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L ...
Page 46: ...Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L Issue 05 02 00 5 1 Operation 5 Operation 5 ...
Page 117: ...5 72 Issue 05 02 00 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L ...
Page 118: ...Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L Issue 05 02 00 6 1 Documentation 6 Documentation 6 ...
Page 123: ...6 6 Issue 05 02 00 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L ...
Page 127: ...7 4 Issue 05 02 00 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L ...
Page 150: ...Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L Issue 05 02 00 9 1 Specifications 9 Specifications 9 ...
Page 155: ...9 6 Issue 05 02 00 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L ...
Page 156: ...Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L Issue 05 02 00 10 1 Appendix 10 Appendix 10 ...
Page 165: ...10 10 Issue 05 02 00 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L ...
Page 166: ...Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L Issue 05 02 00 11 1 Changes 11 Changes 11 ...
Page 168: ...Krautkramer USN 52R Issue 05 02 00 12 1 Index 12 Index 12 ...
Page 176: ...Option DGS Operating Manual ...
Page 179: ...DGS 4 Issue 02 03 99 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L Option DGS ...
Page 180: ...Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L Option DGS Issue 02 03 99 DGS 5 Introduction 1 Introduction 1 ...
Page 191: ...DGS 16 Issue 02 03 99 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L Option DGS ...
Page 203: ...DGS 28 Issue 02 03 99 Krautkramer USN 52R USN 52L Option DGS ...
Page 207: ...DGS 32 Issue 02 03 99 Krautkramer USN 5 USN 52L Option DGS ...