
352
Routing Tables: SUB_VPN1
Destinations : 5 Routes : 5
Destination/Mask Proto Pre Cost NextHop Interface
100.1.1.0/24 Direct 0 0 100.1.1.2 GE2/1/1
100.1.1.2/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
120.1.1.0/24 BGP 255 0 2.2.2.9 NULL0
127.0.0.0/8 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
127.0.0.1/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
Execute the
display ip routing-table
command on CE 3 and CE 4 to verify that the routing
tables contain routes of remote sub-VPNs. Take CE 3 as an example.
[CE3] display ip routing-table
Routing Tables: Public
Destinations : 5 Routes : 5
Destination/Mask Proto Pre Cost NextHop Interface
100.1.1.0/24 Direct 0 0 100.1.1.1 GE2/1/1
100.1.1.1/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
120.1.1.0/24 BGP 255 0 100.1.1.2 GE2/1/1
127.0.0.0/8 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
127.0.0.1/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
Execute the
display ip routing-table
command on CE 5 and CE 6 to verify that the routing
tables contain routes of remote sub-VPNs. Take CE5 as an example.
[CE5] display ip routing-table
Routing Tables: Public
Destinations : 5 Routes : 5
Destination/Mask Proto Pre Cost NextHop Interface
110.1.1.0/24 Direct 0 0 110.1.1.1 GE2/1/1
110.1.1.1/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
127.0.0.0/8 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
127.0.0.1/32 Direct 0 0 127.0.0.1 InLoop0
130.1.1.0/24 BGP 255 0 110.1.1.2 GE2/1/1
CE 3 and CE 4 can ping each other successfully.
[CE3] ping 120.1.1.1
PING 120.1.1.1: 56 data bytes, press CTRL_C to break
Reply from 120.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=1 ttl=252 time=102 ms
Reply from 120.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=2 ttl=252 time=69 ms
Reply from 120.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=3 ttl=252 time=105 ms
Reply from 120.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=4 ttl=252 time=88 ms
Reply from 120.1.1.1: bytes=56 Sequence=5 ttl=252 time=87 ms