![Canon XL1 3CCD Скачать руководство пользователя страница 47](http://html1.mh-extra.com/html/canon/xl1-3ccd/xl1-3ccd_manual_4132600047.webp)
‐
Also,
because
the
file
is
copied
to
users’
computers,
they
can
pass
the
file
among
themselves,
thereby
reducing
your
bandwidth
cost
per
viewer.
‐
The
drawback
is
that
users
can’t
view
any
portion
of
the
file
until
the
download
is
complete.
Æ
Progressive
download
files
‐
During
progressive
download,
a
file
is
transmitted
through
standard
web
protocols
such
as
FTP
(File
Transfer
Protocol)
or
HTTP
(HyperText
Transfer
Protocol),
but
users
can
view
the
part
that
has
already
been
transmitted
while
the
remainder
is
still
downloading.
‐
This
format
allows
the
clip
to
finish
downloading
while
it
is
playing.
‐
Not
affected
by
the
video
and
audio
glitches
associated
with
real
‐
time
streaming.
‐
However,
progressive
download
can’t
provide
reliable
real
‐
time
performance.
[the
whole
buffering
thing]
‐
Progressive
download
is
the
easiest,
cheapest,
and
most
forgiving
type
of
web
video
to
author
and
deploy.
Æ
Real
‐
time
streaming.
‐
Offers
the
traditional
experience
of
seeing
the
video
after
only
a
few
seconds
of
buffering,
but
it
risks
image
glitches,
poor
quality,
and
limiting
the
data
rate
to
the
bandwidth
available
to
the
client
at
the
time
of
viewing.
‐
But
provides
real
‐
time
performance
and
random
access
to
different
parts
of
the
file.
Choosing
a
compression
format
Depending
on
the
project,
picking
the
correct
format
can
be
an
easy
or
a
difficult
decision.
‐
After
you
choose
a
format,
you
need
to
determine
the
versions
of
players
that
support
the
format.
‐
Questions
to
ask
when
choosing
a
format:
•
Features
•
User
base
•
Platforms
Windows
media
format
Содержание XL1 3CCD
Страница 54: ......