Page
164
of
254
Version
6.3
Rev
r012
Date
05-11-2022
Part No. 96000001
11.3
Patch Test Criteria
The patch test requires collecting sounding data over two distinct types of seafloor topography; a
flat bottom is used for the roll computation whereas a steep slope or feature is used for the latency,
pitch, and yaw data collection.
Care must be taken that the sonar head covers the same area on both data collection runs, this may
not be the same as vessel position, especially with an over-the-side mount or if the sonar head
rotated. Only the latency data collection requires a different speed from normal survey speed.
The data collection for Latency, Pitch and Yaw should be done in as deep water as possible. This is
particularly true for the pitch computation because, in shallow water, the angle of pitch may not be
easily determined due to a lack of resolution.
11.3.1
Latency Test
The vast majority of installations will incorporate GPS time synchronisation and, as such, no latency
is expected in the GPS position. However, it is necessary to complete at least one or two latency
tests to prove that the latency, for all practical purposes, is zero. Most patch test programs will not
yield zero latency, but the derived value would be so small to constitute a practical zero.
For the latency test, data is collected on a pre-defined line up a steep slope or over a well-defined
object (such as a rock or small wreck). The line is surveyed at survey speed up the slope and then
surveyed again, in the same direction, but at a speed that should be half of the survey speed. If the
vessel cannot make way at half survey speed, then the fast run will need to be taken at a higher
speed than normal survey speed, and this can influence the latency test due to squat or settlement.
The main consideration is that one line should be twice the speed of the other.
Figure 178: Latency Data collection
Summary of Contents for 2026
Page 2: ...Page 2 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 14: ...Page 14 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 22: ...Page 22 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 28: ...Page 28 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 32: ...Page 32 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 48: ...Page 48 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 56: ...Page 56 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 116: ...Page 116 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 120: ...Page 120 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 122: ...Page 122 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 131: ...Page 131 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022...
Page 138: ...Page 138 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 158: ...Figure 174 Smooth log information copied from a real time survey log...
Page 182: ...Page 182 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 198: ...Page 198 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 210: ...Page 210 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 234: ...Page 234 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Page 237: ...Page 237 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 215 Sonic 2026 Projector...
Page 247: ...Page 247 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 225 SIM Stack Outline...
Page 249: ...Page 249 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 227 Locking Ring type Deck Lead...
Page 251: ...Page 251 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 229 I2NS Type 82 IMU offsets...
Page 253: ...Page 253 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 231 I2NS SIM Dimensions...