Xerox WorkCentre 7120 vs. Ricoh Aficio MP C2050 3
Table of contents
Test conditions:
The device(s) to be tested, lab test equipment and paper are tested with
daily conditions maintained between 68 and 78 degrees Fahrenheit and
35% to 65% RH. Letter-size 20-lb. bond paper is used for all testing.
This document is strictly for internal use and is provided for self training
purposes – it should never be provided in whole or part to a customer.
Productivity
Productivity analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Print drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Job flow sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Scan to searchable PDF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
SMart Kits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Speed comparisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Cost control
Color access controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Ease of installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Device management comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Security
Security features comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Environmental considerations
Environmental friendliness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Environmental awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Image quality
Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Key positioning strengths
Lower MSRP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
12" x 18" / A3+ paper capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
9x hard drive overwrite capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
Specifications
Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
