background image

60

b

ass

g

ear

the LMII. When you compare them back-
to-back,  you  can  definitely  tell  that  they
come from the same family, and they do
share  some  strong  sonic  characteristics.
The  Classic  300  is  more  focused  in  the
mids, and definitely has a greater sense of
“sonic texture.” The LMII, conversely, is a
tad  stronger  in  the  low  end  and  a  little
darker through the mids. While the highs

are brighter on the LMII, they sing a bit
more  coming  from  the  Classic  300,  and
are very rich. The LMII is known for its

killer  midrange  punch,  especially  in  the
low-midrange.  But  the  Classic  300
actually 

has 

greater 

note-to-note

articulation in the meat of the midrange.
The  LMII  may  technically  be  the  more
clear  of  the  two,  but  the  impact  and
distinction (in the mids) offered up by the
Classic 300 is just amazing. With the pre-
gain  set  a  bit  higher  on  the  300,  the

articulation  though  the  mids  got
even better (surpassing the LMII).
The  slap  tone  of  the  Classic  300
was very intriguing, and featured a
ton  of  harmonic  content  (which
might  actually  be  a  bit  hard  to
control). But this amp is probably
going  to  appeal  more  to  heavy-
handed 

fingerstyle 

and

pick-wielding players.

If Marco’s goal was to capture the

sonic impact of a classic SVT, but
offer  more  modern  tone-shaping
controls,  features,  and  safety
/maintenance  improvements,  he
has 

definitely 

succeeded.

Compared  to  an  SVT-VR,  the
Classic  300  captures  a  lot  of  the
same  midrange  focus,  and  sounds
much more like an SVT than does
the more traditionally designed all-
tube  Reeves  Custom  225  (also
reviewed in this issue). By contrast,
the Reeves is bigger and deeper in
the lows, and more clear and open
in  the  midrange.  Actually,  the
same  can  be  said  for  the
Mesa/Boogie  Bass  400  (equipped
with  KT-88’s),  and  the  Sadowsky
SA200, which are more similar to
the Reeves than to the Classic 300.
The  Classic  300  seems  to  fall
somewhere  between  the  Fat  and
Clean  settings  on  the  Sadowsky,
with  more  midrange  focus  and  a
more  aggressive  attack  than  the
SA200.  Conversely,  the  Sadowsky
is  more  smooth,  full,  and  even,
and can cop a wider range of tones.
On  a  whim,  I  also  compared  the
Classic 300 to the GK Fusion 550.

Each  has  a  similar  low  end,  and  similar
harmonic  content,  though  the  Fusion
ends up sounding more quick and clear.

PRESSED INTO DUTY

The Classic 300 and CL 108 went out to
their first gig about a day after I received
them.  I  brought  along  a  backup  rig,  in
case things didn’t go well, or if I had too
hard  of  a  time  dialing  in  proper  tone.  I
needn’t  have  bothered.  Right  out  of  the
box  (literally),  the  Markbass  Classic
Monster  took  control  and  never  let  me
down. The  tone  is  appreciably  full
and  rich,  with  a  certain  warmth
that I have come to associate with a
tube output section. But it was also
quite  clear  and  controlled,  with
good high-end extension. I did find
myself boosting the low-mids just a
tad, but other than that, I left it set
fairly flat (with the bias set to High
Fidelity).  At  this  and  subsequent
gigs, I managed to try a number of
different  basses  through  this  rig.
While  they  all  sounded  good,  the
“instant  classic”  combination  was
with my Roscoe Beck V. That bass
was  just  made  for  this  rig  (and,
interestingly,  is  a  bit  of  a  hybrid
blend of classic and modern designs
in its own right). 

The Classic 300 does not do an

over-the-top overdrive, but you can
dial  in  some  extra  grit/growl,  and
certainly  a  good  deal  of  added
harmonic  content.  My  preferred
setting  was  with  the  pre-gain  run
pretty  hot,  which  adds  some
excitement,  but  is  not  what  you
would  call  distorted  or  overdriven.
The  EQ  controls  are  not  overly
powerful, with useful function over
most of their range. The Low, Mid-
Low, and Mid-Hi sounded better to
my  ears  as  a  cut  than  as  a  boost
(though  slight  boosts  worked  very
well on all three). The High control
worked  very  well  and  sounded
musical  with  both  more  extreme
boost  and  cut.  The  boost  added
high-end  sparkle  without  getting
harsh,  and  the  cut  mimicked  a
passive tone roll-off nicely.

The  mix  of  fullness,  punch,  and

articulation  definitely  reminded  me  of
another – yet far smaller – Markbass head:

Содержание CL 810

Страница 1: ...56 bass gear by Tom Bowlus...

Страница 2: ...the rage nowadays and mentioning the word hybrid to most folks conjures up images of eco friendly high mileage vehicles For us bass players we may also think of the typical hybrid bass head which emp...

Страница 3: ...e for 4 8 ohm loads and one for 2 ohm loads The two more unusual features are the display function switch and RS 232 PC serial port The switch toggles between three modes for the front panel LCD scree...

Страница 4: ...admire with regard to the warm gritty tube powerhouse and the punchy focused midrange attack of a sealed closed 8x10 But he also saw room for improvement especially considering modern technological ad...

Страница 5: ...ange focus and a more aggressive attack than the SA200 Conversely the Sadowsky is more smooth full and even and can cop a wider range of tones On a whim I also compared the Classic 300 to the GK Fusio...

Страница 6: ...interesting mix of vintage fatness and more modern tones It has that midrange punch that you only seem to get from a big sealed cab with a bunch of 10 s but with more control and refinement The tweete...

Страница 7: ...punch and a hint of grit with more control and wider range of tones than vintage counterparts TONE O METER In Hand Score 3 9 average On Bench Score 3 5 average E N C L O S U R E Material Wooden head c...

Страница 8: ...nal 0 6 Volts 1 0 Volts 1 0 Volts Voltage drop 0 7 Volts 0 9 Volts 1 0 Volts D STRING 73Hz Power 195 Watts 286 Watts 263 Watts Input Signal 0 6 Volts 1 0 Volts 1 0 Volts Voltage drop 0 6 Volts 0 8 Vol...

Страница 9: ...The Markbass CL108 8x10 has immediate warmth with great control There are aggressive upper mids and multiple high end personalities TONE O METER In Hand Score 3 5 average On Bench Score 3 7 average E...

Страница 10: ...Tweeter On Red 1 watt Gray 10 watts Green 25 watts Yellow 50 watts Chart 2 showing SPL with Tweeter Off Light Blue 1 watt Purple 10 watts Blue 25 watts Orange 50 watts Markbass Classic 108 with grill...

Страница 11: ...panel care must be exercised as the fan which is secured to the back panel plugs into the chassis using a thin wires and a small plastic connector There is very little slack in the wires to position...

Страница 12: ...speeds as necessary to keep the amp cool This keeps the fan noise to a minimum such as when the higher fan speed is not necessary Additionally the microprocessor monitors critical functions such as po...

Страница 13: ...e function The mute affects the speaker outputs as well as the DI output However the tuner effects send and effects return are not affected by the mute function The effects loop in the Classic 300 is...

Страница 14: ...asis network at the effects send The overall response is theoretically a flat frequency response to a device in the effects loop However the pre emphasis de emphasis has the advantage of potentially l...

Отзывы: