Chapter 5 -- Measurement of Small Signals -- Measurement System Model and Physical Limitations
5-3
For purposes of approximation, the Noise bandwidth,
δ
F, is equal to the measurement frequency. Assume a
10
11
ohm resistor as Z
cell
. At 300
o
K and a measurement frequency of 1 Hz this gives a voltage noise of 41
µ
V
rms. The peak to peak noise is about 5 times the rms noise. Under these conditions, you can make a voltage
measurement of
±
10 mV across Z
cell
with an error of about
±
2%. Fortunately, an AC measurement can
reduce the bandwidth by integrating the measured value at the expense of additional measurement time. With
a noise bandwidth of 1 mHz, the voltage noise falls to about 1.3
µ
V rms.
Current noise on the same resistor under the same conditions is 0.41 fA. To place this number in perspective, a
±
10 mV signal across this same resistor will generate a current of
±
100 fA, or again an error of up to
±
2%.
Again, reducing the bandwidth helps. At a noise bandwidth of 1 mHz, the current noise falls to 0.012 fA.
With E
s
at 10 mV, an EIS system that measures 10
11
ohms at 1mHz is about 3 decades away from the Johnson
noise limits. At 0.1 Hz, the system is close enough to the Johnson noise limits to make accurate measurements
impossible. Between these limits, readings get progressively less accurate as the frequency increases.
In practice, EIS measurements usually cannot be made at high enough frequencies that Johnson noise is the
dominant noise source. If Johnson noise is a problem, averaging reduces the noise bandwidth, thereby
reducing the noise at a cost of lengthening the experiment.
Finite Input Capacitance
C
in
in Figure 5-1 represents unavoidable capacitances that always arise in real circuits. C
in
shunts R
m
, draining
off higher frequency signals, limiting the bandwidth that can be achieved for a given value of R
m
. This
calculation shows at which frequencies the effect becomes significant. The frequency limit of a current
measurement (defined by the frequency where the phase error hits 45
o
) can be calculated from:
f
RC
= 1/ ( 2
ω
R
m
C
in
)
Decreasing R
m
increases this frequency. However, large R
m
values are desirable to minimize the effects of
voltage drift and voltage noise in the I/E converter’s amplifiers.
A reasonable value for C
in
in a practical, computer controllable low current measurement circuit is 20 pF. For a
3 nA full scale current range, a practical estimate for R
m
is 10
7
ohms.
f
RC
= 1/ 6.28 (1x10
7)
(2x10
-12
)
≈
8000 Hz
In general, one should stay two decades below f
RC
to keep phase shift below one degree. The uncorrected
upper frequency limit on a 30 nA range is therefore around 80 Hz.
One can measure higher frequencies using the higher current ranges (i.e. lower impedance ranges) but this
would reduce the total available signal below the resolution limits of the "voltmeter". This then forms one basis
of statement that high frequency and high impedance measurements are mutually exclusive.
Software correction of the measured response can also be used to improve the useable bandwidth, but not by
more than an order of magnitude in frequency.
Leakage Currents and Input Impedance
In Figure 5-1, both R
in
and I
in
affect the accuracy of current measurements. The magnitude error due to R
in
is
calculated by:
Error = 1- R
in
/(R
m
+R
in
)
Содержание PCI4/300 Potentiostat/Galvanostat/ZRA
Страница 3: ...i...
Страница 7: ......
Страница 12: ...Chapter 1 Introduction Potentiostat Schematic Diagram 1 3 Figure 1 1 PCI4 Analog Circuits in Potentiostat Mode...
Страница 15: ...Chapter 1 Introduction Notational Conventions 1 6...
Страница 42: ...Chapter 5 Measurement of Small Signals Floating Operation 5 8...
Страница 59: ...Appendix F CE Certificate Certificate of Conformance 6 17 Appendix F CE Certificate Certificate of Conformance...
Страница 60: ...Appendix F CE Certificate Certificate of Conformance 6 18...