Version 1.0
©Copyright 2014, Ambient LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Page 6
10.
California Proposition 65
WARNING:
Use of the Ambient Weather Products can expose you to chemicals, including lead and
lead compounds, which are known to the State of California to cause cancer and bisphenol A (BPA),
and phthalates DINP and/or DEHP, which are known to the State of California to cause birth defects
or other reproductive harm.
Can I Trust that Ambient Weather Products are Safe Despite this Warning?
In 1986, California voters approved the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act known as
Proposition 65 or Prop 65. The purpose of Proposition 65 is to ensure that people are informed about
exposure to chemicals known by the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects and/or other
reproductive harm. A company with ten or more employees that operates within the State of California
(or sells products in California) must comply with the requirements of Proposition 65. To comply,
businesses are: (1) prohibited from knowingly discharging listed chemicals into sources of drinking
water; and (2) required to provide a "clear and reasonable" warning before knowingly and
intentionally exposing anyone to a listed chemical. Proposition 65 mandates that the Governor of
California maintain and publish a list of chemicals that are known to cause cancer, birth defects and/or
other reproductive harm. The
, which must be updated annually, includes over 1,000
chemicals, including many that are commonly used in the electronics industry.
Although our manufacturing process is "lead-free" and RoHS compliant, it remains possible that trace
amounts of lead could be found in components or subassemblies of Ambient Weather Products.
Bisphenol A (BPSA) could conceivably be present in minute amounts in our plastic housings, lenses,
labels or adhesives, and DEHP & DINP (phthalates) could possibly be found in PVC wire coatings of
our cables, housings, and power cords. Unlike RoHS, Prop 65 does not establish a specific threshold
for reporting on the substances of concern and instead sets forth a much less definitive standard
requiring that the business demonstrate with certainty that there is "no significant risk" resulting from
exposure. With respect to carcinogens, the "no significant risk" level is defined as the level which is
calculated to result in not more than one excess case of cancer in 100,000 individuals exposed over a
70-year lifetime. In other words, if you are exposed to the chemical in question at this level every day
for 70 years, theoretically, it will increase your chances of getting cancer by no more than 1 case in
100,000 individuals so exposed. With respect to reproductive toxicants, the "no significant risk" level
is defined as the level of exposure which, even if multiplied by 1,000, will not produce birth defects or
other reproductive harm. In other words, the level of exposure is below the "no observable effect
level," divided by 1,000. (The "no observable effect level" is the highest dose level which has not been
associated with observable reproductive harm in humans or test animals.) Proposition 65 does not
clarify whether exposure is to be measured only in normal operation, or in the event of misuse such as
intentionally damaging, incinerating or consuming an Ambient Weather Product or component and
Ambient Weather has not attempted to evaluate the level of exposure.
A Proposition 65 warning means one of two things: (1) the business has evaluated the exposure and
has concluded that it exceeds the "no significant risk level"; or (2) the business has chosen to provide a
warning simply based on its knowledge about the presence of a listed chemical without attempting to
evaluate the exposure. The California government has itself clarified that "The fact that a product
bears a Proposition 65 warning does not mean by itself that the product is unsafe." The government
has also explained, "You could think of Proposition 65 more as a 'right to know' law than a pure
product safety law."
While using Ambient Weather Products as intended, we believe any potential exposure would be
negligible or well within the "no significant risk" range. However, to ensure compliance with
California law and our customers' right to know, we have elected to place the Proposition 65
