background image

 

FORCE GAUGE CALIBRATION 

If the zero reading of the force gauge (Figure 16) has drifted away from the zero line, the gauge 

should be readjusted prior to further use as follows:
1. Remove the suction cup by pulling it from the stem of the handle.
2.  Use a Phillips screwdriver to loosen the screw at the top of the connection stem (Figure 17) 

with a firm turn. Remove the nylon stem and washer located inside the stem (Figure 18).

3.  Insert a straight blade screwdriver (4 mm [1/8“] wide) in threaded hole at the end of the 

spring/plunger assembly and catch the slot of the adjustment screw seated about 3 cm (1”) 

down inside the brass plunger (Figure 18).

4.  Loosen the screw. If there is excessive resistance, heat the screw slightly using a hairdryer to 

soften the locking resin (Figure 19).

5.  Loosen the screw and adjust it until the gauge is on the zero line (Figure 16). Compress the 

spring a few times and check that the zero reading remains correct. Fine readjustment may  

be needed. If the screw was heated, wait until it cools to room temperature before proceeding 

to the next step.

6.  Lock the screw by applying a drop of LOCTITE 242 locking fluid (or equivalent) to top edge  

of screw. Use a toothpick to ensure that the fluid is applied directly to the entire top edge of 

the screw. Wait ten minutes for the locking fluid to set.

7.  Reassemble in reverse order. Place the washer into the nylon stem as shown in Figure 20. 

Apply a drop of locking fluid to the tip of the thread near the end of the screw. Push the screw 

up though the end of the stem and through the washer.

8.  Finally, slip the spring/plunger on the handle down into the stem. Rotate the stem until the slot 

in the stem aligns with the rib in the handle and slips all the way into the handle, then tighten 

the screw.

9.  Wait 24 hours before using the device to ensure that the locking resin obtains full strength. 

During this time, the ResQPUMP should be hung by the strap or left resting on the handle  

with the suction cup pointing up.

Figure 16

Figure 17

Figure 18

Figure 19

Figure 20

Decompression

Compression

30

0

kg

40

15
10

50

80/min

LIFT

 to 10 kgs

Use enough

force to

COMPRESS 

to 2” (5 cm) depth

SUMMARY OF PRIMARY CLINICAL STUDY
Study Design and Methods

The ResQTRIAL was a prospective, multi-center, two-arm, randomized, controlled,  

partially masked clinical study conducted under 21 C.F.R. §50.24, 

Exemption from  

Informed Consent under Emergency Circumstances, and was funded by a grant from the  

National Institutes of Health (NIH). Study oversight was conducted by an independent Clinical 

Events Committee responsible for the review of all adverse events and inclusion/ 

exclusion adjudication and an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board to review  

aggregate data to provide recommendations whether or not to continue subject  

enrollment.

Rescuers provided CPR using the ResQCPR System at 80 compressions per minute (the S-CPR 

group received compressions at the AHA-recommended rate of 100 compressions per minute). 

Patients were followed for one year after cardiac arrest to determine if the ResQCPR System 

improved survival rates after cardiac arrest. Neurological outcomes were assessed at the time of 

hospital discharge, and then 30, 90 and 365 days after cardiac arrest.

The principal data elements that led to device approval were a post hoc analysis of  

survival up to one year after cardiac arrest not incorporating the consideration of  

neurological function. The primary safety and effectiveness endpoint defined in the  

protocol was survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurologic function, defined as  

a modified Rankin Scale score (MRS) of 

 3. The MRS assessment takes into consideration the 

subject’s neurologic status both prior to and following cardiac arrest. However,  

conclusions and inferences regarding the original prospective primary endpoint for the ResQTRIAL 

(i.e., survival with good neurological outcome) cannot be drawn from the ResQTRIAL due to  

interpretability issues related to the neurological component of that composite endpoint. The 

hypothesis-based secondary safety endpoint was the overall rate of major adverse events through 

hospital discharge. The hypothesis-based secondary effectiveness endpoint was long term  

neurologic function assessed using the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI, Version 

E-1.1) score at 90 and 365 days. CASI is measured on a scale of 0-100, with higher scores 

signifying better outcomes. 

All subjects in non-traumatic arrest determined by emergency medical services (EMS)  

personnel to require CPR according to their local protocols were randomized and treated  

in this study. The intention-to-treat (ITT) population was comprised of all subjects randomized to 

S-CPR or CPR using the ResQCPR System who met the study enrollment criteria regardless of  

the cause of the non-traumatic cardiac arrest. A subset of the ResQTRIAL ITT population was 

comprised of patients who had a cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac etiology and who have the 

potential to benefit from CPR. This subgroup was defined as the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) 

primary analysis population. Baseline demographics and parameters were similar between study 

groups as shown in Table 1. 

Table1: ResQTRIAL Pivotal Phase Demographics and Baseline Characteristics

1

Parameter

S-CPR

ResQCPR

ITT

(n=1201)

mITT

(n=813)

ITT

(n=1269)

mITT

(n=842)

Age, years (mean ± SD)

64.2 ± 17.2

66.8 ± 14.5

63.3 ± 17.8

67.0 ± 15.2

Male

752 (62.6)

539 (66.3)

803 (63.3)

559 (66.4)

Race:

  White

  Asian

  Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander

  American Indian/Alaska Native

  Black/African American

  Unknown

960 (79.9)

39 (3.2)

4 (0.3)

18 (1.5)

152 (12.7)

28 (2.3)

660 (81.2)

31 (3.8)

3 (0.4)

9 (1.1)

94 (11.6)

16 (2.0)

1035 (81.6)

29 (2.3)

1 (0.1)

22 (1.7)

155 (12.2)

26 (2.1)

715 (84.9)

19 (2.3)

1 (0.1)

10 (1.2)

88 (10.5)

9 (1.1)

Ethnicity:

  Hispanic/Latino

  Not Hispanic/Latino

  Unknown

22 (1.8)

1149 (95.7)

30 (2.5)

15 (1.8)

782 (96.2)

16 (2.0)

32 (2.5)

1207 (95.2)

29 (2.3)

19 (2.3)

811 (96.3)

12 (1.4)

Bystander witnessed arrest

EMS witnessed arrest

Unwitnessed arrest

Not available

517 (43.1)

146 (12.2)

536 (44.7)

383 (47.1)

76 (9.4)

353 (43.4)

546 (43.2)

144 (11.4)

575 (45.5)

400 (47.5)

80 (9.5)

361 (42.9)

Bystander CPR

  Not available

489 (40.7)

1

350 (43.1)

1 (0.1)

532 (42.0)

2

358 (42.5)

0  (0.0)

Initial recorded cardiac rhythm:

   Ventricular fibrillation/pulseless 

ventricular tachycardia

  Asystole

  Pulseless electrical activity

  Not available

294 (24.5)

597 (49.7)

293 (24.4)

17 

247 (30.4)

379 (46.6)

180 (22.1)

7 (0.9)

335 (26.4)

633 (49.9)

284 (22.4)

16

292 (34.7)

376 (44.7)

171 (20.3)

3 (0.4)

911 call to EMS CPR start,  

minutes

2

 (mean ± SD)

6.7 ± 3.5

6.6 ± 3.4

6.7 ± 3.2

6.7 ± 3.2

911-to-first study device placed, 

minutes (mean ± SD)

2

-

-

7.1 ± 3.5

7.1 ± 3.5

Duration CPR, minutes (mean ± SD)

25.6 ± 13.0

27.60 ± 12.24

26.3 ± 12.3

28.10 ± 11.45

Pre-hospital ROSC

3

490 (40.8)

324 (39.9)

524 (41.3)

345 (41.0)

Numbers shown are subjects (%) unless otherwise indicated

Does not include subjects with EMS witnessed arrests 

ROSC = Return of spontaneous circulation

Safety and Effectiveness Results
Survival 

One of the major objectives of the ResQTRIAL was to determine the safety and effectiveness of the 

ResQCPR treatment from the time of a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to survival status  

one year later; this is shown in Table 2. The results demonstrated that the likelihood of short and 

longer-term survival was improved in the ResQCPR arm. At one year, there was a 34% increase  

in the survival rate in subjects in the ITT population receiving CPR with the ResQCPR System  

compared with S-CPR. 

Table 2: Survival of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Subjects Subjects from  

ROSC to One Year

1

ITT

mITT

S-CPR

(n=1201)

ResQCPR

(n=1269)

S-CPR

(n=813)

ResQCPR

(n=842)

ROSC during CPR before hospital 

admission

490 (40.8)

524 (41.3)

324 (39.9)

345 (41.0)

Admitted to hospital 

342 (28.5)

381 (30.0)

216 (26.6)

239 (28.4)

Survived to 24 hours  

following arrest

Not available

277 (23.3)

12

310 (24.6)

11

176 (21.6)

9

199 (23.8)

6

Alive at hospital discharge

Not alive at hospital discharge 

Not available

123 (10.3)

1072 

6

150 (11.9)

1114 

5

80 (9.9)

727 

6

105 (12.5)

735 

2

Alive at 30 days

Not alive at 30 days

Not available

98 (8.3)

1086

17

131 (10.4)

1123

15

65 (8.1)

738

10

96 (11.5)

741

5

Alive at 90 days

Not alive at 90 days

Not available

88 (7.5)

1089

24

116 (9.3)

1129

24

58 (7.3)

740 

15

87 (10.4)

746

9

Alive at 1 year

Not alive at 1 year

Not available

68 (5.8)

1103

30

96 (7.8)

1137

36

48 (6.0)

746

19

74 (9.0)

748

20

1

 Numbers shown are subjects (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Kaplan Meier survival analyses were performed in the subgroup of subjects who had a return  

of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) for both the ITT and mITT populations (where the number of  

subjects with ROSC is shown above in Table 1). The findings in these analyses are consistent with 

the overall study results. The Kaplan Meier curves in Figure 21 show that the majority of subjects 

with ROSC do not survive post-hospitalization out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, the Kaplan 

Meier estimate of survival at one year was 30% higher in subjects in the ITT population receiving 

CPR with the ResQCPR System compared with S-CPR (22.7% vs. 17.5%).

Figure 21: Kaplan Meier Analysis of Subjects with ROSC Following  

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Importantly, there was no increase in the number of subjects with severe neurologic impairment 

in the ResQCPR group, that is, the neurological outcome in patients who received CPR with the 

ResQCPR System appeared to be no worse than the control (S-CPR). In the mITT, proportional 

differences between the two treatment groups were observed to become larger over time. 

Approximately 50% more subjects receiving CPR with the ResQCPR System were alive one year 

after OHCA compared with those treated with S-CPR. However, this comparison was not  

prospectively specified or adjusted for multiplicity.

Secondary Safety Endpoint

The analysis of safety was based on the randomized cohort of 2470 subjects in the ITT population 

and 1655 subjects in the mITT subgroup available for the evaluation prior to hospital discharge. 

The safety analysis included major adverse events that were reported during the pre-hospital  

resuscitation effort and up to the point of hospital discharge, as applicable. There were no  

differences in overall major adverse event rates between the study groups in the mITT population; 

thus the secondary safety endpoint was met. Reported major adverse events by type are shown  

in Table 3.

Event

ITT

mITT

S-CPR

(n= 1201)

ResQCPR

(n= 1269)

S-CPR 

(n=813)

ResQCPR 

(n=842)

Subjects with 

1 major 

adverse event through 

hospital discharge (sec-

ondary safety endpoint

2

)

1129 (94.0)

1194 (94.1)

766 (94.2) 789 (93.7)

Death

1074 (89.4)

1115 (87.9)

729 (89.7) 735 (87.3)

Re-arrest

230 (19.2)

260 (20.5)

161 (19.8) 185 (22.0)

Stroke/cerebral bleeding

11 (0.9)

11 (0.9)

3 (0.4)

2 (0.2)

Internal organ injury

2 (0.2)

2 (0.2)

0 (0.0)

1 (0.1)

Hemothorax

3 (0.3)

3 (0.2)

1(0.1)

2 (0.2)

Bleeding requiring  

intervention

8 (0.7)

17 (1.3)

3 (0.4)

7 (0.8)

Cardiac tamponade

4 (0.3)

5 (0.4)

3 (0.4)

2 (0.2)

Aspiration

20 (1.7)

16 (1.3)

7 (0.9)

8 (1.0)

Pneumothorax

11 (0.9)

13 (1.0)

7 (0.9)

10 (1.2)

Seizure

19 (1.6)

23 (1.8)

13 (1.6)

11 (1.3)

Rib/Sternal fracture

23 (1.9)

18 (1.4)

14 (1.7)

11 (1.3)

Pulmonary edema

3

96 (8.0)

143 (11.3)

62 (7.6)

94 (11.2)

1

  Numbers shown are subjects with at least one report of the listed adverse event types. If multiple events of same type were 

reported, the event is only counted once per subject. Reports of deaths, re-arrest, seizure, and pulmonary edema in the field 

(e.g., pre-hospital) are also shown. All other adverse event types were assessed based on review of medical records for  

subjects transported to a hospital. There were no Major Adverse Events associated with device malfunctions, defects, or 

failures.

2

  Secondary safety endpoint: The rate of major adverse events in the ResQCPR group (mITT) was found to be non-inferior to 

that in S-CPR group (p < 0.0001) within a non-inferiority margin of 5%.

3

  Data shown includes combined pre-hospital and in-hospital reports of pulmonary edema. Pulmonary edema was defined 

as any of the following: 

Pre-hospital reports

 of advanced airway filled with fluid 

2 times; blood, mucous, fluid or other 

secretions in the airway; reports of pulmonary edema or pleural/pulmonary effusion on post-mortem examinations; and, for 

subjects transported to a hospital, 

in-hospital reports

 of pulmonary edema or pleural/pulmonary effusion confirmed on x-ray 

or CT scan. Pre-hospital pulmonary edema was reported in 22 patients (2.7%) in the S-CPR group, and in 30 patients (3.6%) 

in the ResQCPR group (mITT).

The only difference in adverse events between the two groups was the observation that more 

patients receiving CPR with the ResQCPR System had pulmonary edema. A post hoc analysis 

appeared to demonstrate that the presence of pulmonary edema did not adversely affect 

effectiveness as measured by survival. 

Secondary CASI Effectiveness Endpoint

The pre-specified secondary effectiveness endpoint was an evaluation of long-term neurological 

function using Mean Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) scores at 90 and 365 days. 

The study was not able to demonstrate an improvement in neurologic function in the ResQCPR arm 

based upon CASI scores (as was hypothesized); however, CASI scores were not significantly  

different among survivors who were discharged from the hospital. The mean scores included  

subjects who died after hospital discharge, with a CASI score equal to 0 assigned to those who 

died. More than 85% of the one-year survivors in both study arms completed the one-year CASI  

assessment and the mean CASI scores for these subjects were 93.7 ± 11.8 (n=30) in the S-CPR 

arm and 94.7 ± 4.4 (n=41) in the ResQCPR arm for the mITT population, consistent with full or 

nearly full recovery in both groups; ITT scores were 91.9 ± 13.5 (n=43) in the S-CPR arm and 

92.3 ± 12.3 (n=49) in the ResQCPR arm.. There were only three patients with CASI scores <70, 

a score consistent with poor neurological function, in both groups. There is limitation in interpreting 

the comparison of these CASI results between groups, since the comparison is not based on all 

randomized patients but rather is conditional on the survival of subjects at 90 days or 1 year.

Subjects with a Drug/Medication Overdose 

A post-hoc analysis of subjects with a presumed medication or drug overdose, as determined by 

CEC adjudication, suggested that CPR using the ResQCPR System in this patient population may 

have resulted in unfavorable clinical results for drug/medication overdose patients as compared to 

both 1) S-CPR for drug/medication overdose patients, and 2) CPR utilizing the ResQCPR System  

for non-traumatic arrest patients not having drug/medication overdose as the arrest etiology. 

Among S-CPR and ResQCPR subjects with drug/medication overdose arrest etiologies, 20% of 

S-CPR (13/65) and 14% of ResQCPR (14/97) subjects survived to hospital discharge.  

Overall Conclusions

The results of the pivotal trial demonstrate that the ResQCPR System increased the likelihood of  

survival after non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest when compared with manual S-CPR, the 

current standard of care for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States today. 

One year survival rates were relatively 34% higher when CPR was performed with the ResQCPR 

System compared with S-CPR for all subjects in the ITT population (7.8% vs. 5.8%), and relatively 

49% higher for those in the mITT population (9.0% vs. 6.0%). These principal data elements that 

led to device approval by FDA, and are accordingly represented in the labeling and indications 

for use for the ResQCPR System, were a post hoc analysis of survival not incorporating the  

consideration of neurological function. One year after OHCA, more than 95% of surviving  

subjects in both treatment groups had excellent neurological function, as determined by cognitive, 

functional, and quality of life testing. In cardiac arrest of etiology known to be drug/medication 

overdose, the favorable results with use of the ResQCPR System may not be present.

RESQPOD ITD 16 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Operating Specifications

Safety check valve threshold

–16 cmH

2

O

Expiratory airway impedance

<5 cmH

2

O

Timing assist lights flash rate

10/min

Shelf Life

Four years

Temperature Range

Operation

-18º to 50º C (0º to 122º F)

Storage

-40 to 60º C (-40º to 140º F)

Dimensions

Height

8.2 cm

Diameter

5.3 cm

Circumference

16.6 cm

Patient side connection

15 mm ID/22 mm OD

Ventilation side connection

22 mm ID

Dead space

41 ml

Weight

62 gm

Materials

Exterior housing and interior molded components

Polycarbonate

Diaphragm and safety check valve gasket

Silicone

Safety check valve spring

Nickel plated stainless steel

Battery

3 V disposable lithium ion coin cell

ResQPOD and ResQPUMP are registered trademarks of Advanced Circulatory. These products and 

their use are protected by one or more of the following patents: USA – 5,645,522; 6,155,257; 

6,224,562; 6,234,985; 6,312,399; 6,425,393; 6,463,327; 6,587,726; 8,151,790. 

Foreign – CNZL96193712.2; EP0898485 (France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, United Kingdom). 

Other USA and country patents pending.

RESQPUMP ACD-CPR DEVICE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Operating Specifications

Force gauge compression range

0 - 50 kgs ± 15%

Force gauge decompression range

0 - 15 kgs ± 15%

Metronome Function

Signal pitches

768 Hz (low) and 3070 Hz (high)

Sound level

65 dB at distance of 0.5 m for sound source

Rate

80/min

Temperature Range

Operation

-18º to 50º C (0º to 122º F)

Storage

-40 to 60º C (-40º to 140º F)

Dimensions

Suction cup

13.5 cm OD

Height

17.0 cm

Weight

0.58 kg (1.28 lb)

Materials

Suction cup and cushion pad

Silicone

Handle and support ring

Polyamide (nylon), glass fiber reinforced

Connection stem

Acetal polyoxymethylene

Support ring

Thermoplastic polyester elastomer

Metal parts

Stainless steel and brass

Battery

3.6 V primary lithium-thionyl chloride

ACCESSORIES AND REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS AVAILABLE  

FOR THE RESQCPR SYSTEM
Reorder #  

Description

12-0825-000  

ResQCPR System (one ResQPUMP; two ResQPODs)

12-0822-000  

ResQPOD ITD 16 (single device)

12-0823-000  

ResQPUMP ACD-CPR Device (single device)

12-0586-000  

 Suction Cup for ACD-CPR Device (replacement suction  

cup with support ring and compression cushion)

12-0935-000 

ResQCPR Carrying Case (holds one ResQPUMP and two ResQPODs)

Table 3: ResQTRIAL (Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) Subjects with Major Adverse  

Events Through Hospital Discharge

1

LIMITED WARRANTY

Subject to the terms, conditions and limitations contained herein, Advanced Circulatory warrants only to the 

ultimate user of the product that Advanced Circulatory’s products will not fail to operate in accordance with their 

specifications due to defects in material or workmanship during the time period listed below. The foregoing period 

is sometimes referred to as the “original warranty period.” The foregoing limited warranty does not apply to any 

part, portion, or component of any product which is manufactured by a third-party (“Third-Party Component”). The 

time period for the warranty begins on the date of delivery of the product to the first purchaser. ResQPOD: Period 

ending on the earlier of the date of first use or the expiration date on the package for the product provided by 

Advanced Circulatory. ResQPUMP: 12 months

 

THE LIMITED WARRANTY SET FORTH IN THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH, IS THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE  

WARRANTY WITH RESPECT TO ADVANCED CIRCULATORY’S PRODUCTS. ADVANCED CIRCULATORY  

MAKES NO OTHER EXPRESS WARRANTY OF ANY KIND OR NATURE AS TO THE PRODUCTS OR THEIR 

PERFORMANCE EXCEPT FOR THOSE LIMITED WARRANTIES EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THE FOREGOING 

PARAGRAPH AND EXCEPT THEREFORE, SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL REPRESENTATIONS OR  

WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE CONCERNING THE PRODUCTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED 

TO, ANY REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY THAT THE PRODUCTS COMPLY WITH ANY LAW, OR THAT ANY  

PARTICULAR RESULT WILL BE OBTAINED BY USING THE PRODUCTS. ADVANCED CIRCULATORY MAKES NO  

WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO ANY THIRD PARTY COMPONENT AND ADVANCED CIRCULATORY  

SPECIFICALLY SELLS SUCH THIRD-PARTY COMPONENTS “AS IS” WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY. FURTHER, 

ADVANCED CIRCULATORY MAKES NO IMPLIED WARRANTY OF ANY KIND OR NATURE WITH RESPECT  

TO ITS PRODUCTS OR ANY THIRD-PARTY COMPONENT AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMERS ANY AND 

ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF 

MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, OR COMPLIANCE WITH 

ANY FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL LAW, RULE OR REGULATION. IN ADDITION, ADVANCED CIRCULATORY 

EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS TO THE FULLEST EXTENT ALLOWED BY LAW, RULE OR REGULATION ANY WARRANTY 

PROVIDED UNDER ANY LAW.

 

The limited warranties set forth above shall be null and void if (a) any alterations or modifications are made to 

a product, (b) a product is not maintained in strict compliance with the maintenance requirements set forth in the 

maintenance manual for such product or otherwise provided by Advanced Circulatory, (c) any repairs are made  

to a product which are not authorized by Advanced Circulatory in writing, (d) any failure of a product to comply 

with the above limited warranty is not reported to Advanced Circulatory in writing within thirty (30) days of the 

date such failure first occurs, (e) a product is operated after the failure of any warranty first occurs, (f) a product is 

used for any purpose other than for the purpose for which it was manufactured, (g) a product is not operated in 

strict compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in any operating manual, notice or other statement  

accompanying the product, (h) a product is abused or damaged, (i) purchaser fails to deliver the product to 

Advanced Circulatory for inspection and testing if requested by Advanced Circulatory or purchaser disposes of 

the product or any part or component on or before the thirtieth (30th) day after sending a written claim under the 

warranty to Advanced Circulatory, (j) such failure of the limited warranty results from a failure of any third party 

component, or (k) a product is not stored or handled as directed in writing by Advanced Circulatory.

 

The sole and exclusive remedy for any failure of any product to comply with the limited warranty set forth above 

or any other warranty imposed upon Advanced Circulatory by Law, if any, shall, at the election of Advanced 

Circulatory, in its sole discretion, be either (a) the repair or replacement of the product or component which failed 

to comply with such warranty or (b) the refund of the purchase price of the product. Except as provided below, 

any repair or replacement shall carry the same warranty as the original product but only for the remainder of the 

original warranty period. Purchaser’s exclusive remedy with respect to any claim arising out of or as a result of 

third-party component shall be against the third-party manufacturer.

 

Any and all claims under the above limited warranty shall be made to Advanced Circulatory only in writing and 

not later than thirty (30) days after the date the product first fails to comply with the above limited warranty but in 

no event later than the expiration of the original warranty period with respect to which the claim is being made. 

Any claim under the above limited warranty made after such period for making a claim shall be null and void. 

After receiving written notice of the warranty claim, Advanced Circulatory shall determine whether to (a) repair  

or replace the product or part or (b) refund the purchase price of the product. Advanced Circulatory may require  

purchaser to return any Product or component thereof which purchaser claims to be defective to Advanced 

Circulatory at purchaser’s cost for inspection as a condition to any claim under the above limited warranty.  

No product or part may be returned to Advanced Circulatory without Advanced Circulatory’s prior written  

authorization. If a product which is returned is determined by Advanced Circulatory in its sole discretion not to 

have failed to comply with the limited warranty, purchaser shall pay costs of removal, repair and/or replacement 

for such product. If a product which is returned is determined by Advanced Circulatory n its sole discretion to have 

failed to comply with the limited warranty, Advanced Circulatory shall pay for all repair and/or replacement costs 

for such product (or refund the purchase price if so elected by Advanced Circulatory) and Advanced Circulatory 

shall reimburse purchaser for the reasonable costs of shipping the product or component to purchaser.

17-0829-000, 08

Manufactured by: 

Advanced Circulatory

1905 County Road C West, Roseville, MN 

55113 USA

Telephone: 651-403-5600

Customer service: 1-877-737-7763

Email: [email protected]

Website: AdvancedCirculatory.com 

10

11

12

13

Отзывы: