background image

3

July 6, 2010

AN1559.0

to the victim receiver path. It taps the victim receive 
path directly.

The QHx220 evaluation platform is an open loop system, 
meaning that the optimization is performed manually. 
With the addition of a microcontroller and some kind of 
signal quality parameter fed back from the victim 
receiver such as C/N, BER, RSSI, etc., the system can 
operate closed loop. A simple algorithm can be coded to 
optimize the gain and phase of the cancellation signal 
based on the previous state of the quality parameter 
provided by the victim receiver. Seed values can also be 
used to improve the initial starting point state for the 
optimization algorithm. Thus minimizing the number of 
iterations required to achieve convergence. A look-up 
table could also be implemented for systems operating 
on multiple channel frequencies, but this may not be 
necessary for extremely narrow band applications. 

Essential Factors to Integrating the QHx220 

Device into Your System 

The purpose of this section is to provide some design 
guidelines to ensure the successful integration of the 
QHx220 into your system. 

1. DO NOT exceed approximately -45dBm (exact limits 

are specified within the datasheet depending on 
frequency band) maximum input power of the 
QHx220 device.

2. The sampled noise must be the same noise 

(correlated with) as the noise that aggresses the 
victim antenna. The amount of correlation is 
proportional to the amount of cancellation that can 

be achieved using the QHx220 device. It is often 
necessary to try multiple tapping points and tapping 
methods in order to achieve the best possible 
correlation to the noise present in the victim 
antenna. 

3. Be sure to choose the correct level of pre-amplification 

as described in the previous sections. If this is not 
set correctly, it will limit the tuning range of the 
QHx220 device and hence limit the amount of 
cancellation that it is possible to achieve.

4. The delay from the noise source to the cancellation 

node (via the coupling channel) should be matched 
with the delay of noise source to the cancellation 
node (via the sampler path). The main source of 
mismatched delay is often due to the filter in the 
receiver path. Using the same filter in the sampler 
path is often a simple means of achieving sufficient 
matching of the delay of both paths. One could also 
move the cancellation node to precede the filter in 
the receive path and eliminate the filter in the 
sampler path. This could have drawbacks in some 
applications depending on the out-of-band noise 
characteristics and the noise sampling method 
used.

5. The high impedance RF output of the QHx220 

devices must be placed <5mm from the cancellation 
node (the tapping point of the victim receiver), 
otherwise resonances can occur that will attenuate 
the cancellation signal. Figure 2 shows the effect of 
varying the distance “L” between the QHx220 output 
and the tapping point of the victim receiver.

FIGURE 2. DISTANCE FROM CANCELLATION NODE vs FREQUENCY

VI

C

T

IM ANTENN

TO RADIO

FREQUENCY (GHz)

d

B

 (S

(2

, 1)

)

-5

-10

-15

-20

-25

0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

L = 10mm

L = 5mm

L = 20mm 

L = 25mm 

L = 15mm 

15

16

14

13

12

10

9

11

6

5

7

8

QHx

1

3

4

2

L

Application Note 1559

Summary of Contents for QHx220

Page 1: ...10 QHx220 Board Layout 10 QHx220 Board Schematics for GPS 11 QHx220 Board Bill of Materials for GPS 12 GPS Optimization Setup Static Coupling Channel 12 GPS Application Setup 14 WLAN Product Application 15 QHx220 Board Layout 15 QHx220 Board Schematics for WLAN 16 QHx220 Board Bill of Materials for WLAN 17 WLAN Optimization Setup Static Coupling Channel 17 WLAN Application Setup 19 Q ACTIVE 19 CAU...

Page 2: ...he QHx220 has internal LNA gain stages that can be set to pre amplify the sampled input noise if necessary The amount of pre amplification required if any depends on coupling factors between the noise source and the victim antenna as well as the level of the sampled noise at the input of the QHx220 Since the dynamic range of the QHx220 is typically 50dB the noise level at the input of the QHx220 s...

Page 3: ...0 device It is often necessary to try multiple tapping points and tapping methods in order to achieve the best possible correlation to the noise present in the victim antenna 3 Be sure to choose the correct level of pre amplification as described in the previous sections If this is not set correctly it will limit the tuning range of the QHx220 device and hence limit the amount of cancellation that...

Page 4: ...gs into the USB port of the PC and is used to control the SPI bus interface of the QHx220 device The USB controller board also has a 1 8V regulated supply that is used to power the QHx220 device The user may alternatively power the device with an external power supply if so desired A custom cable is also provided which is keyed so that it plugs into the USB controller board in the correct orientat...

Page 5: ...rview on how the QHx220 can be applied for use in Mobile TV product applications QHx220 Board Layout SPI INTERFACE NOISE SAMPLER INPUT INTERSIL QHx220 1 8V INPUT Rx INPUT FROM ANTENNA Rx OUTPUT TO RECEIVER GND LED FIGURE 5 QHx220 EVALUATION BOARD LAYOUT MTV Application Note 1559 ...

Page 6: ...6 July 6 2010 AN1559 0 QHx220 Board Schematics for MTV FIGURE 6 SCHEMATIC OF QHx220 EVALUATION BOARD MTV Application Note 1559 ...

Page 7: ...e coupling loss between the aggressor source and the MTV victim antenna For the purpose of this evaluation the attenuator should be roughly 10dB to 20dB for a typical coupling factor Keep in mind that the second power splitter adds an additional 6dB to the coupling factor Since the QHx220 has 50dB dynamic range this range of attenuation should set the aggressor power in the middle of the tuning ra...

Page 8: ...sired frequency Figure 8 is an example of the type of cancellation that should be achieved when the I and Q values have been optimized Once the cancellation has been optimized record the I and Q values for the optimization of the setup used FIGURE 7 MTV OPTIMIZATION SETUP DIAGRAM ATTENUATOR PAD TO SET COUPLING LOSS MTV AGGRESSOR NETWORK ANALYZER QHx220 CANCELLATION NODE POWER SPLITTER PORT 1 PORT ...

Page 9: ...that degrades the receive signal strength reported by the MTV receiver turn on the QHx220 board and set the optimized I and Q values that were determined in the MTV Optimization Setup Static Coupling Channel section on page 7 This should result in a 15dB recovery of the receive signal strength power reported by the MTV receiver if the board was optimized correctly However since the setup was sligh...

Page 10: ...overview on how the QHx220 can be applied for use in GPS product applications QHx220 Board Layout SPI INTERFACE INTERSIL QHx220 1 8V INPUT Rx INPUT FROM ANTENNA Rx OUTPUT TO RECEIVER GND LED NOISE SAMPLER INPUT FIGURE 10 QHx220 EVALUATION BOARD LAYOUT GPS Application Note 1559 ...

Page 11: ...ND1 C4 10nF GND1 1V8 L2 100nH C5 100pF D1 LED R2 220 1V8 GND1 GND2 GND1 C6 C_Select L3 L_Select GND1 L4 L_Option C7 C_Option GND1 1V8 R0 DNI 1 2 JP 1 1 2 3 4 JP 2 SPI L7 10k L6 14k L5 10k R5 14k R4 14k R3 14k GND1 GND1 GND1 QHx220 GND1 1 GND1 3 IN 2 ENBAR 4 VDDD 5 CLK 6 DATA 7 EXTR 8 BUS 9 GND2 10 RF 11 GND2 12 VDDA 13 VDDA 14 IND 15 GND2 16 U1 FIGURE 11 SCHEMATIC OF QHx220 EVALUATION BOARD GPS Ap...

Page 12: ...nts the coupling loss between the aggressor source and the GPS victim antenna For the purpose of this evaluation the attenuator should be roughly 10dB to 20dB for a typical coupling factor Keep in mind that the second power splitter adds an additional 6dB to the coupling factor Since the QHx220 has 50dB dynamic range this range of attenuation should set the aggressor power in the middle of the tun...

Page 13: ...le of the type of cancellation that should be achieved when the I and Q values have been optimized Once the cancellation has been optimized record the I and Q values for the optimization of the setup used ATTENUATOR PAD TO SET COUPLING LOSS GPS AGGRESSOR NETWORK ANALYZER QHX220 CANCELLATION NODE POWER SPLITTER PORT 1 PORT 2 POWER SPLITTER 50Ω TERMINATION PATH FIGURE 12 GPS OPTIMIZATION SETUP DIAGR...

Page 14: ...es the receive signal strength reported by the GPS receiver turn on the QHx220 board and set the optimized I and Q values that were determined in the GPS Optimization Setup Static Coupling Channel section on page 12 This should result in a 15dB recovery of the receive signal strength power reported by the GPS receiver if the board was optimized correctly However since the setup was slightly modifi...

Page 15: ...verview on how the QHx220 can be applied for use in WLAN product applications QHx220 Board Layout SPI INTERFACE INTERSIL QHX220 1 8V INPUT Rx INPUT FROM ANTENNA Rx OUTPUT TO RECEIVER GND LED NOISE SAMPLER INPUT FIGURE 15 QHx220 EVALUATION BOARD LAYOUT WLAN Application Note 1559 ...

Page 16: ...ND1 C4 10nF GND1 1V8 L2 100nH C5 100pF D1 LED R2 220 1V8 GND1 GND2 GND1 C6 C_Select L3 L_Select GND1 L4 L_Option C7 C_Option GND1 1V8 R0 DNI 1 2 JP1 1 2 3 4 JP 2 SPI L7 10k L6 14k L5 10k R5 14k R4 14k R3 14k GND1 GND1 GND1 QHX2 20 GND1 1 GND1 3 IN 2 ENBAR 4 VDDD 5 CLK 6 DATA 7 EXTR 8 BUS 9 GND2 10 RF 11 GND2 12 VDDA 13 VDDA 14 IND 15 GND2 16 U1 FIGURE 16 SCHEMATIC OF QHx220 EVALUATION BOARD WLAN A...

Page 17: ...resents the coupling loss between the aggressor source and the WLAN victim antenna For the purpose of this evaluation the attenuator should be roughly 10dB to 20dB for a typical coupling factor Keep in mind that the second power splitter adds an additional 6dB to the coupling factor Since the QHx220 has 50dB dynamic range this range of attenuation should set the aggressor power in the middle of th...

Page 18: ...ntil the maximum attenuation is achieved at the desired frequency Figure 18 is an example of the type of cancellation that should be achieved when the I and Q values have been optimized ATTENUATOR PAD TO SET COUPLING LOSS WLAN AGGRESSOR NETWORK ANALYZER QHX220 CANCELLATION NODE POWER SPLITTER PORT 1 PORT 2 POWER SPLITTER 50Ω TERMINATION PATH FIGURE 17 WLAN OPTIMIZATION SETUP DIAGRAM 90 40 30 20 10...

Page 19: ...ues that were determined in the WLAN Optimization Setup Static Coupling Channel section on page 17 This should result in a 15dB recovery of the receive signal strength power reported by the WLAN receiver if the board was optimized correctly However since the setup was slightly modified from the original optimization setup it should be possible to fine tune the QHx220 to improve the in band noise c...

Page 20: ...Mouser Electronics Authorized Distributor Click to View Pricing Inventory Delivery Lifecycle Information Intersil EBH220BWIMAX EVALZ ...

Reviews: