
Performance Considerations for Tape Drives and Libraries
13
SAN Configurations
Fibre Channel (FC) offers many advantages over SCSI. First, it overcomes the distance limitations
of SCSI (12 meters for LVD SCSI versus 300 meters for a short-wave 2-Gb FC link)
and allows for
the transmission of data at higher speeds. As a serial network protocol rather than a bus-based
architecture like SCSI, FC has also become the protocol of choice for the implementation of SANs,
allowing for the consolidation of data storage resources. In addition, each FC connection is made
up of a transmit link and a receive link, allowing for full-duplex operation. This means that data can
be transmitted in two directions simultaneously. Therefore, during a backup operation across a
single FC connection, data can be read from a source and written to tape without taking turns in
communication, effectively doubling the bandwidth of a connection. See Figure 1-5.
Figure 1-5.
Fibre Channel Link Diagram
When setting up tape libraries in a SAN, performance can still be affected by various factors. These
factors include FC link speeds, data flow between the source and tape library, and performance
limitations of external storage arrays. With an understanding of the overall setup and management
of the solution, many of these factors can be avoided.
Even with the high data bandwidth offered by the FC protocol in SANs, proper considerations
must be made for tape drives in order to avoid a situation in which the FC link may limit
performance. The data rate of a 2-gigabit (Gb) FC link is 200 MB/sec (that is, 200 MB/sec on the
transmit link and 200 MB/sec on the receive link). Therefore, attempting to operate multiple tape
drives across the same link can potentially exceed the full bandwidth of a link. If the host is
operating with a legacy 1-Gb adapter, backing up data to two drives may be sufficient to reveal
significant performance limitations.
Therefore, when using three or more tape drives simultaneously on a 2-Gb link, you may need to
distribute the backups across a number of connections, rather than relying on a single link. This is
where understanding the SAN solution's topology is beneficial. Following the data path during a
backup operation as it is read from the source and then written out to tape will help administrators
recognize any potential bottlenecks. If any bottlenecks are identified, measures may be taken
depending on the configuration. For example, if the backup solution requires multiple drives to be
in operation at once, splitting the tape hardware across separate fabrics may improve performance
by splitting the connections. See Figure 1-6.
HOST
Fibre
Channel
Device
Transmit
Receive
Receive
Transmit
2 Gb = 200 MB/sec
2 Gb = 200 MB/sec
Summary of Contents for PowerVault 110T LTO2
Page 4: ...4 Contents ...
Page 25: ...w w w d e l l c o m s u p p o r t d e l l c o m Dell PowerVault 系统 磁带驱动器和磁带存储库 性能注意事项 ...
Page 28: ...28 目录 ...
Page 41: ...磁带驱动器和磁带存储库性能注意事项 41 图 1 10 采用一个磁带驱动器时的光纤信道桥接器布线 存储库 SCSI 接口 SCSI 1 终结处理器 驱动器 1 ...
Page 48: ...48 磁带驱动器和磁带存储库性能注意事项 w w w d e l l c o m s u p p o r t d e l l c o m ...
Page 52: ...52 Sommaire ...
Page 78: ...78 Inhalt ...
Page 104: ...104 目次 ...
Page 126: ...126 テープドライブとライブラリのパフォーマンスに関する考慮事項 w w w d e l l c o m s u p p o r t d e l l c o m ...
Page 127: ...w w w d e l l c o m s u p p o r t d e l l c o m Dell PowerVault 시스템 테이프 드라이브 및 라이브러리의 성능 고려사항 ...
Page 130: ...130 차례 ...
Page 154: ...154 Índice ...