background image

IBM posts SPEC CPU2006 scores for dual-core BladeCenter HS21 blade  
 

January 16, 2008 ... IBM® BladeCenter® HS21 blade servers, coupled with the BladeCenter 
chassis, deliver advanced application serving with performance, power efficiency, and scalability, 
all of which makes them ideal for enterprise environments. 
 
The HS21 blade server, using Intel’s latest dual-core technology, has demonstrated competitive 
performance on the SPEC CPU2006 benchmark suite.  
 
The scores in the following tables are the first SPEC CPU2006 results published for the HS21 
blade model using the Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor X5260 (3.33GHz, 6MB L2 cache, 1333 
MHz FSB—2 processors/4 cores/4 threads). (1) These results were achieved using SUSE Linux® 
Enterprise Server 10 x64.  
 

SPEC CPU2006 

Benchmark

 

HS21 – Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor X5260       

(3.33GHz, 6MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz FSB)

 

SPECint2006

 

27.3 

SPECint_rate2006

 

81.2 

SPECint_rate_base2006

 

69.3 

SPECfp2006

 

24.2 

SPECfp_rate2006

 

56.8 

SPECfp_rate_base2006

 

50.6 

 
 
Results are current as of January 16, 2008. The scores have been submitted to SPEC for review 
and will be posted on their Web site upon successful completion of the review. View all published 
results at www.spec.org. 
                                                                                                                                                 
(1) Planned availability for the HS21 model using the Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor X5260 is 
February 1, 2008.  
 
IBM and BladeCenter are trademarks or registered trademarks of International Business 
Machines Corporation.

 

Intel and Xeon are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation. 
Linux is a registered trademark of Linux Torvalds in the United States, other countries, or both.

 

SPEC, SPECfp, and SPECint registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation 
Corporation.

 

All other company/product names and service marks may be trademarks or registered 
trademarks of their respective companies.

 

 
 
 

 
 

Reviews: