background image

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY

The CS3.6 is a precision instrument designed to very accurately translate electronic information into musical sound. All our efforts have

been directed toward achieving extremely faithful translation of all tonal, spatial and dynamic information supplied by the amplifier.

The CS3.6 is not intended to mask or mitigate shortcomings of the recording or other components in the music playback system.
We believe this approach is the only way to provide the potential of experiencing all the subtle aspects that help make reproduced music

a most enjoyable human experience.

PERFORMANCE GOALS

Since quality of musical performance is a very complex issue it is helpful to objectively identify the aspects involved. We believe

musical performance can be described, with not much oversimplification, as performance in four areas.

Tonal fidelity includes overall octave-to-octave balance, the fidelity of timbres, absence of vowel-like colorations, and bass extension.
Spatial fidelity includes how wide and deep the performing space seems, how convincingly instruments are placed from the center to

laterally beyond the speakers, how realistic the depth perspective is, how little the speakers’ positions seem to be the source of the sound,
and how large the listening area is.

Transient fidelity includes how convincingly realistic is the reproduction of the initial or ‘attack’ portions of sounds and how clearly

reproduced is musically subtle low–level information.

Dynamic fidelity includes how well the speaker maintains the contrasts between loud and soft and how unstrained and effortless is the

reproduction of loud passages.

FUNDAMENTAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

In our opinion, natural spatial reproduction requires creating a realistic sound field within the listening room by mimicking the properties

of natural sound sources. These properties include wide area radiation and the absence of out-of-phase energy. To meet these requirements
the CS3.6 employs dynamic drivers. Dynamic drivers have the advantages of providing a point source radiation pattern with good dispersion
of sound over a wide area, great dynamic capability, good bass capability and a lack of rearward out-of-phase energy. Another advantage of
dynamic drivers is their small size which allows the multiple drivers to be arranged in one vertical line. This alignment avoids the problem
of line source designs which must place their different drivers side-by-side, causing the distances from each driver to the listener to change
with different listener positions.

The major potential disadvantages of dynamic speakers are diaphragm resonances (“cone break-up”), time errors, phase errors, cabinet

resonance, and cabinet diffraction. None of these problems is a fundamental limit and all can be minimized or eliminated by thorough and
innovative engineering, resulting in a speaker system without significant fundamental limitations.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

The task of engineering a speaker system requires the translation of the musical performance goals into technical goals. Although there

are also many minor design considerations, the following are what we believe to be the major technical requirements that contribute to each
of the musical goals.

1

CS3.6 DESIGN HIGHLIGHTS

• Extremely accurate frequency response:
  29 Hz - 20 KHz 

±

1

1

/

2

 dB

• Coherent Source design: complete phase and time coherence
• Point source radiation pattern
• Very low energy storage
• Very high quality, innovative driver design

Crossover

The CS3.6 crossover incorporates 25 elements implemented

with 38 components. Most of the components are used to provide a
high degree of response shaping, correcting even small
imperfections that are usually ignored. Very high quality
components are used to ensure very low distortion levels. For
example, polypropylene capacitors are used extensively and all
capacitors are bypassed with custom–made polystyrene and foil
units. Also, all inductors are air-cored types wound with low
oxygen wire.

Specifications:

Bandwidth (-3dB)

27 - 22 KHz

Frequency response

29 - 20 KHz 

±

1

1

/

2

 dB

Phase response

minimum 

±

5

°

Time response

150 

µ

s  -20 dB

Sensitivity

86 dB @ 2.8v-1m

Impedance

4

 (2.5

 minimum)

Recommended power

100 - 500 watts

Size

48

1

/

2

 h x 12

1

/

2

 w x 17 d inches

Weight

107 pounds

Driver Complement:

• 10" very long excursion woofer with advanced magnet system

and aluminum diaphragm operates up to 500 Hz.

• 4" mid-range with two–layer, air-core diaphragm and long-

gap/short coil motor system operates from 500 to 3000 Hz.

• 1" high output metal dome tweeter operates above 3 KHz.
• 10" passive bass radiator

Tonal fidelity:
• Accurate frequency response so as to not over or under

emphasize any portion of the sound spectrum

• Absence of resonances in the drivers or cabinet so as not to

introduce tonal colorations

Spatial fidelity:
• Point-source, uni-polar radiation
• Time response accuracy to preserve natural spatial cues
• Lack of cabinet diffraction

Transient fidelity:
• Phase coherence to provide realistic reproduction of attack

transients

• Very low energy storage to provide clarity of musical detail
Dynamic fidelity:
• High output capability
• Low distortion

Summary of Contents for Coherent Source CS3.6

Page 1: ...Loudspeaker This paper describes some of the technical performance aspects design considerations and features of the THIEL model CS3 6 loudspeaker system It is intended to supply information for those who are interested in such matters It is not intended to imply that good measured technical performance is sufficient to guarantee good sonic performance ...

Page 2: ...g the distances from each driver to the listener to change with different listener positions The major potential disadvantages of dynamic speakers are diaphragm resonances cone break up time errors phase errors cabinet resonance and cabinet diffraction None of these problems is a fundamental limit and all can be minimized or eliminated by thorough and innovative engineering resulting in a speaker ...

Page 3: ...ies The CS3 6 mid driver uses a very effective new method of greatly reducing diaphragm resonance patent applied The diaphragm is constructed of two cones each with a different shape which are joined at the rim and at the neck with only air between them The resulting three dimensional structure is drastically stronger than a conventional diaphragm of equal weight This increased strength causes the...

Page 4: ...s To greatly reduce diffraction the CS3 6 employs a front baffle that is curved at the edges so energy radiated along the baffle can continue into the room without encountering abrupt cabinet edges Figures 9 and 10 illustrate the beneficial effects of the CS3 6 s curved baffle on the response of the tweeter Results The end result of greatly reducing diffraction and diaphragm resonances is a speake...

Page 5: ...results in the loss of spatial and transient information During the past decade the fourth order Linkwitz Riley crossover has risen in popularity and it is sometimes promoted as being phase coherent What is actually meant is that the two drivers are in phase with each other through the crossover region However neither driver is in phase with the input signal nor with the drivers output at other fr...

Page 6: ...motion with a viscous material so that the stored energy can be dissipated as heat instead of mechanical vibration which produces unwanted sound This method has limited benefit for two reasons First energy can only be dissipated as heat after there is unwanted mechanical vibration to convert Secondly even though some of the absorbed energy is transformed into heat it is still absorbed from the des...

Page 7: ... 6 woofer incorporates heavy copper rings around the center pole With these rings any changes in the magnet s strength induces an electrical current in the rings which generates a magnetic field that is opposed to and practically cancels the original change A second problem is that the field strength is not symmetrical in front of and behind the gap but is stronger behind the gap than in front of ...

Reviews: