background image

the projector provides those two User
color temperature memories. If you have
a need to alternate between lamp levels,
perform two color temperature calibra-
tions and save each one separately. 

While less than specified (not uncom-

mon), the JVC’s contrast ratio still pro-
vides state-of-the-art performance for a
digital projector (See”Measurements.”)
The only chink in the JVC’s black-level

armor is a slightly brighter level in the
four corners of the screen, noticeable
mainly when the projector is displaying a
completely black or very dark image. (I
saw this same artifact on the Sony VPL-
VW100 or”Ruby,” but not on the Sony
VPL-VW50”Pearl.”) 

If I had never seen a CRT projector, I

would be tempted to call the JVC’s blacks
spectacular. Typically, the full-screen video

black levels on the best DLP projectors
have measured between 0.005 and 0.008
foot-Lamberts. The Sharp XV-Z20000 set
a new record of 0.002fL. And the JVC, to-
gether with the Sony VPL-VW50”Pearl,”
measured approximately the same (I say
approximately because the Minolta LS-
100 we and nearly everyone else in the in-
dustry use for this measurement is only
good to three decimal places and then

ultimate

AV

With a component 1080i input, the

JVC’s black and white (luminance) re-
sponse to the multiburst patterns on my
AccuPel HDG-3000 test-pattern genera-
tor held up well to 37.1MHz with no un-
evenness, though the output there was
clearly down in level compared to the
18.5MHz burst. There was also some 

very

slight

edge enhancement that could not be

defeated by reducing the Sharpness control
without excessively softening the image.
At 720p, component, the response was also
still visible at 37.1MHz, though more re-
duced in level and with a bit more edge-
enhancement. Both 480i and 480p looked
good to their specified limits (6.75MHz
and 13.5MHz, respectively), though there
was clearly visible, non-defeatable edge en-
hancement.

With an HDMI input at 1080i or 720p,

both the color and black and white re-
sponse were still visible and clean at
37.1MHz, though subtly down in level—
just a hair short of the best I have seen
from a projector (the Marantz VP-11S1).
There was no visible edge enhancement at
all at 1080i, and the Sharpness pattern was
crisp and clean. The same for 720p, though
at that resolution a bit of edge enhance-
ment was added. The 480i/p responses
were essentially the same as component.

With the Mask control off, the overscan

was zero on all sides in 720p or 1080i,
HDMI or component. In 480i/p it ranged
between 2% and 3%. 

The JVC’s color points were typical of

most new digital projectors and short of

ideal. Red and blue were a little
oversaturated, green was very
oversaturated. While the subjec-
tive color of the projector was
good, I wish manufacturers
would at least give us the option
to select accurate colors. 

Before calibration, the JVC

produced its best grayscale in the
Middle setting. The Low setting
dropped down to about 6000K
across the full brightness range,
and the high setting was over
10,000K. The Before and After
results of the calibration I per-
formed are shown in the chart
(using the Normal lamp setting). The After
results don’t differ all that much in their
Kelvin temperatures, so the Before and
After results appear to be very similar. But,
as usual, the accuracy of the points them-
selves came closer to the D6500 standard
after calibration (6500K is a line on the
color chart, but the D6500 standard is the
exact point on that line we’re aiming for).
The single adjustments for red, green, and
blue proved sufficient to get a good result.
This is not true of all displays, which often
need high and low adjustments, but don’t
always provide them. 

I measured the JVC’s contrast ratio by

placing the projector very close to a
screen, producing an image less than 2-
feet wide. This not only raised both the
black and white levels to a point where
the black level could be read by my Mi-
nolta LS-100 light meter with greater ac-

curacy, but also limited the light reflected
around my non-black room so that I
could determine a modified ANSI con-
trast (measuring just the four center
squares of the 16 squares on the standard
ANSI checkerboard pattern). I measured a
peak contrast ratio of 8752:1 and a mod-
ified ANSI contrast of 139:1, both with
the Lamp on Normal. (I also ran these
measurements on the Sony Pearl under
the same conditions, in Auto Iris 2, Low
lamp, and obtained readings of 5949:1 and
133:1, respectively.) 

In the Normal Gamma setting (which

I used for all of my testing and viewing)
I measured a gamma of very close to 2.2
across most of the brightness range from
dark to bright, increasing to 2.5 at 20IRE
(the lowest point measured) and decreas-
ing slightly to 2.1 at 90IRE at the top
end. 

Measurements

Summary of Contents for DLA-HD1

Page 1: ...layed This has ad vantages LCD can be used in either flat panel displays with a backlight or in front or rear projection applications using a miniaturized imaging chip and a lamp as a light source But LCD also has disad vantages A major downside is increased spacing between the pixels a require ment to accommodate the near micro scopic wiring needed to pass signals to those imaging elements This s...

Page 2: ... controls are located on the top of the case but every control you ll need is also available on JVC s well de signed remote The remote offers direct input selection and direct access to a number of frequently used functions in cluding Brightness Contrast Color Sharpness and six different Image Pro files Cinema Natural Dynamic and User 1 2 and 3 While the video adjust ments are global across all in...

Page 3: ...ording to JVC it quadruples the frame rate to 96fps The HD1 s Gennum GF9351 scaling dein terlacing chip doubles the 24fps input to 48fps the 48fps to 96fps step is added elsewhere in the projector s video pro cessing downstream of the Gennum This eliminates the need for 3 2 pull down with 1080p 24 sources The only consumer sources of 1080p 24 material at present are the out puts of a few not all B...

Page 4: ...image partic ularly on good high defini tion material offers plenty of depth and dimensionality The JVC is very quiet in its Normal lamp mode and only slightly louder in High It s not as quiet as the Sony Pearl or Mitsubishi HC5000 but quieter than the Sharp XV Z20000 Its noise is also pitched fairly low making it less intrusive than the usual high fre quency rushing air sound While I didn t use t...

Page 5: ...resolution a bit of edge enhance ment was added The 480i p responses were essentially the same as component With the Mask control off the overscan was zero on all sides in 720p or 1080i HDMI or component In 480i p it ranged between 2 and 3 The JVC s color points were typical of most new digital projectors and short of ideal Red and blue were a little oversaturated green was very oversaturated Whil...

Page 6: ...o on different scenes But at a shade over half the price of the Sharp the deep black and contrast ratio performance of the JVC can only be de scribed as amazing On most program material I also found the JVC to be a hair sharper than the Sharp This was surprising because while both projectors clearly responded to the 37 1MHz video burst on my Ac cuPel test pattern generator tested in HDMI the respo...

Page 7: ... bringing out subtle slightly brighter highlights in most dark scenes This is almost certainly due to the brightness compression in the Sony s dy namic iris When the iris closes down on dark scenes it also chokes off these high lights a bit too not enough to compro mise the picture significantly but enough to limit the way in which those high lights can enhance a scene And third the JVC s image wa...

Reviews: