![CML Microcircuits CMX649 Application Note Download Page 19](http://html1.mh-extra.com/html/cml-microcircuits/cmx649/cmx649_application-note_2627444019.webp)
CMX649 Wireless Voice Link Design Guide
©
2004 CML Microcircuits
Page 19 of 42
Lithium-based batteries provide many benefits, but the technology that yields
these benefits requires special care and precaution, especially with regards to
operating voltage, operating temperature, current discharge rate and
recharging. In particular, lithium-based batteries can be damaged if excessive
discharge occurs, or if an over/undervoltage condition is allowed to develop.
Many lithium-based batteries are supplied with protection circuitry that is
designed to prevent these harmful conditions. Please consult the battery
vendor for more information on care, operation, and recharging issues related
to lithium-based batteries.
The battery circuit is configured to easily accommodate an external, user-supplied
charging circuit. Vendors such as Micrel, Maxim, National Semiconductor, Texas
Instruments and others supply integrated circuits that can form the foundation of a
battery charging circuit.
A Micrel MIC79110 1.2A linear Li-Ion battery charger demonstration board was used
in the development work for this project. Information on the Micrel MIC79110
integrated circuit and demonstration board can be found at:
www.micrel.com.
For more information on this battery and related battery charging issues, please visit:
www.ultralifebatteries.com
.
4.5 Voltage
Regulators
Two low-voltage dropout (LDO) regulators from Maxim are used in this design. The
low-noise MAX8510EXK25 is used to translate the nominal 3.7V battery voltage to
2.5V for the RF transceiver, and the low-noise MAX8511EXK33 produces the 3.3V
for the other integrated circuits. These products were chosen because of their low
noise performance, small size and low cost. For more information on these
products, please visit:
www.maxim-ic.com
.
4.6 Peripheral
Functions
Two approaches were considered for the timing source used in this design. Each
approach offers costs and benefits, and the end customer must make the
determination regarding which approach best suits their requirements:
•
A 16MHz crystal for the RF transceiver and an 8MHz crystal for the
microcontroller and voice codec.
•
An 8MHz crystal for the RF transceiver, microcontroller and voice codec
The first approach uses two crystals, one for the RF transceiver and the other for the
voice codec and microcontroller. This approach would yield a slight improvement in
adjacent channel rejection, at a cost of the additional crystal, load capacitors, and
required board space.
The second alternative is the use of a single 8MHz crystal for the RF transceiver,
microcontroller, and voice codec. This approach represented the optimal trade-off