Appendix B. Distance vs. Antenna Gain, Terrain, and Other Factors
B-9
Fade margin = 141 – Lpath
Using the Lpath values from TABLE
, gives:
TABLE B-11. Fade Margin (dB) vs. Distance for 2-Ray Propagation Model in Example #2
Path Type
2 mi.
4 mi.
6 mi.
8 mi.
10 mi.
14 mi.
18 mi.
22 mi.
26 mi.
30 mi.
2-Ray
22
10
3
–2
–6
–12
–16
–20
–23
–25
From TABLE
we see that this link should be very reliable up to a
distance of 4 miles and somewhat reliable at a distance of 6 miles. LOS
MAX
for
this link is approximately 10.5 miles, so it could be possible to increase
distance by substituting higher gain antennas. Also, increasing antenna
elevation at one or both ends of the link could be beneficial.
Example #3
You need to run 125 ft of cable for the transmitter:
How much loss if I use LMR195 cable? 125 ft • (11.1 dB/100 ft) = 13.9 dB
How much loss if I use LMR400 cable? 125 ft • (3.9 dB/100 ft) = 4.9 dB
If I am using path loss from the 2-Ray model, and operating fine at 8 miles
with LMR195 cable, how much more fade margin could I expect if I use
LMR400 cable (assuming similar terrain and antenna elevations)?
13.9 dB – 4.9 dB => 9 dB more fade margin
Summary of Contents for RF407 Series
Page 2: ......
Page 3: ......
Page 7: ......
Page 11: ...Table of Contents iv...
Page 37: ...RF407 Series Spread Spectrum Radio 26...
Page 39: ......
Page 49: ...Appendix B Distance vs Antenna Gain Terrain and Other Factors B 10...
Page 50: ......