Page
169
of
254
Version 6.3
Rev
r012
Date
05-11-2022
11.6
Basic data collection criteria
Patch test data collection does not have to be in any set order, but the order that the values
are computed, in the data collection or processing software, will be in a distinct order.
Normally, Latency is the first value that is computed, followed by Roll, Pitch and Yaw (or
heading). The solving order is important, as will be seen below.
11.7
Patch Test data collection error areas
There are many common errors, or mistakes, made during the patch test data collection.
11.7.1
Positioning
The accuracy of the positioning system is a common area where errors arise. DGPS has, at best,
a variability of ± 0.50 metres, whereas RTK variability is ±0.05metres.
A recent article, in
Hydro International
(‘Stop Using DGPS’; Hydro International; Volume 16,
Issue 7; Oct 2012) documents this issue very well.
The article fully details the errors that can occur by using DGPS, instead of highly accurate
positioning for the Patch Test data collection. The error increases inversely with the water
depth, i.e. the shallower the water, the larger the error that can be induced by using DGPS over
more accurate positioning.
However, many users do not have any better positioning capabilities than DGPS; how can they
still obtain valid patch test results without having centimetric accurate positioning? This is, in
large part, what this paper is concerned with. However, even with centimetric position, the
following should be followed.
11.7.2
Feature chose for the test
Where at all possible, for latency, pitch and heading data collection, a feature should be used
rather than a slope. Slopes tend to be too variable as opposed to a well-defined feature such as
a wreck, rock outcrop or pipeline.
One of the other issues, with using a slope, is that many times the shallow end of the slope
does not allow sufficient area or depth for the vessel to come about and line up for the
reciprocal run; this does not allow sufficient time for the motion sensor to settle down nor for
the helmsman to find a steady course.
It has been found that when using a slope, for the pitch calibration, that the heading angular
offset can have a large influence. If the sonar head does not track exactly the same route, up
and down the slope, the heading offset will affect the pitch angular result.
Содержание 2026
Страница 2: ...Page 2 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 14: ...Page 14 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 22: ...Page 22 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 28: ...Page 28 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 32: ...Page 32 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 39: ...Page 39 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 24 Projector cable clamp bolt mounting arrangement...
Страница 48: ...Page 48 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 55: ...Page 55 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 42 Projector cable as of 17 March 2022...
Страница 56: ...Page 56 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 116: ...Page 116 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 120: ...Page 120 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 122: ...Page 122 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 131: ...Page 131 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022...
Страница 138: ...Page 138 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 158: ...Figure 174 Smooth log information copied from a real time survey log...
Страница 182: ...Page 182 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 198: ...Page 198 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 210: ...Page 210 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 234: ...Page 234 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001...
Страница 237: ...Page 237 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 215 Sonic 2026 Projector...
Страница 241: ...Page 241 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 219 Sonic 2022 Receiver Projector horizontal offset...
Страница 242: ...Page 242 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001 Figure 220 Sonic 2024 Mounting Bracket Drawing...
Страница 243: ...Page 243 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 221 Sonic 2022 Mounting Bracket Drawing...
Страница 244: ...Page 244 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001 Figure 222 Sonic 2026 Mounting Bracket Drawing...
Страница 245: ...Page 245 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 223 Sonic 2024 2022 Mounting Bracket Flange...
Страница 246: ...Page 246 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001 Figure 224 SIM Box Drawing...
Страница 247: ...Page 247 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 225 SIM Stack Outline...
Страница 249: ...Page 249 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 227 Locking Ring type Deck Lead...
Страница 250: ...Page 250 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001 Figure 228 I2NS Type 42 IMU Dimensions...
Страница 251: ...Page 251 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 229 I2NS Type 82 IMU offsets...
Страница 252: ...Page 252 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001 Figure 230 I2NS IMU Cable...
Страница 253: ...Page 253 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Figure 231 I2NS SIM Dimensions...
Страница 254: ...Page 254 of 254 Version 6 3 Rev r012 Date 05 11 2022 Part No 96000001 Figure 232 Dual Head Mount Offsets...