Pepperl+Fuchs SIL KFD0-RSH-1 Скачать руководство пользователя страница 7

Safety Manual SIL KFD0-RSH-1(-Y2), KFD2-SL-4

Planning

 2

014-07

7

2.2

Assumptions

The following assumptions have been made during the FMEDA analysis:

The device shall claim less than 10 % of the total failure budget for a SIL2 

safety loop.

For a SIL2 application operating in Low Demand Mode the total PFD

avg

 value 

of the SIF (

S

afety 

I

nstrumented 

F

unction) should be smaller than 10

-2

, hence 

the maximum allowable PFD

avg

 value would then be 10

-3

.

For a SIL2 application operating in High Demand Mode of operation the total 

PFH value of the SIF should be smaller than 10

-6

 per hour, hence the 

maximum allowable PFH value would then be 10

-7

 per hour.

The device shall claim less than 10 % of the total failure budget for a SIL3 

safety loop.

For a SIL3 application operating in Low Demand Mode the total PFD

avg

 value 

of the SIF (

S

afety 

I

nstrumented 

F

unction) should be smaller than 10

-3

, hence 

the maximum allowable PFD

avg

 value would then be 10

-4

.

For a SIL3 application operating in High Demand Mode of operation the total 

PFH value of the SIF should be smaller than 10

-7

 per hour, hence the 

maximum allowable PFH value would then be 10

-8

 per hour.

Failure rate based on the Siemens SN29500 data base.

Failure rates are constant, wear out mechanisms are not included.

External power supply failure rates are not included.

The safety-related device is considered to be of type 

A

 components with a 

Hardware Fault Tolerance of 

0

.

Since the loop has a Hardware Fault Tolerance of 

0

 and it is a type 

A

 

component, the SFF must be > 60 % according to table 2 of IEC 61508-2 for a 

SIL2 (sub)system.

Since the loop has a Hardware Fault Tolerance of 

0

 and it is a type 

A

 

component, the SFF must be > 90 % according to table 2 of IEC 61508-2 for a 

SIL3 (sub)system.

It is assumed that the device will be used under average industrial ambient 

conditions, which are comparable with the classification "stationary mounted" 

in MIL-HDBK-217F. Alternatively, the following ambient conditions are 

assumed:

• IEC 60654-1 Class C (sheltered location) with temperature limits in the 

range of the manufacturer's specifications and an average temperature 

of 40

º

C over a long period. A moisture level within the manufacturer's 

specifications is assumed. For a higher average temperature of 60

º

C, 

the failure rates must be multiplied by a factor of 2.5 based on empirical 

values. A similar multiplier must be used if frequent temperature 

fluctuations are expected.

Содержание SIL KFD0-RSH-1

Страница 1: ...ISO9001 2 3 Relay Module KFD0 RSH 1 Y2 KFD2 SL 4 PROCESS AUTOMATION SAFETY MANUAL SIL...

Страница 2: ...ry for Products and Services of the Electrical Industry published by the Central Association of the Electrical Industry Zentralverband Elektrotechnik und Elektroindustrie ZVEI e V in its most recent v...

Страница 3: ...and Directives 5 2 Planning 6 2 1 System Structure 6 2 2 Assumptions 7 2 3 Safety Function and Safe State 8 2 4 Characteristic Safety Values 9 3 Safety Recommendation 12 3 1 Interfaces 12 3 2 Configu...

Страница 4: ...safety functions can damage property and the environment or cause personal injury for which Pepperl Fuchs GmbH accepts no liability The devices have been developed manufactured and tested according to...

Страница 5: ...uit proofed and overload proofed Line fault detection can be enabled via DIP switch Fault LED and collective error output via Power Rail behave as described within the data sheet of the device 1 3 Man...

Страница 6: ...assumed to be higher than once per year The relevant safety parameters to be verified are the PFH value Probability of dangerous Failure per Hour Fault reaction time of the safety system the SFF value...

Страница 7: ...value would then be 10 8 per hour Failure rate based on the Siemens SN29500 data base Failure rates are constant wear out mechanisms are not included External power supply failure rates are not includ...

Страница 8: ...relay outputs need protection by a fuse initiating at 80 of the rated current to avoid contact welding 2 3 Safety Function and Safe State Safety Function KFD0 RSH 1 Y2 Whenever the input of the device...

Страница 9: ...function Output relay in OFF state when input is de energized s 251 6 FIT dd 0 FIT du 0 4 FIT no effect 69 6 FIT total safety function 252 FIT SFF 99 8 MTBF 1 452 years PFH 4 00 x 10 10 1 h PFDavg fo...

Страница 10: ...y in OFF state when input is de energized s 255 FIT dd 0 FIT du 4 4 FIT no effect 72 8 FIT total safety function 259 FIT not part 0 FIT SFF 98 3 MTBF 1 440 years PFH 4 38 x 10 9 1 h PFDavg for Tproof...

Страница 11: ...FMEDA report Device type A Demand mode Low Demand Mode or High Demand Mode Safety function Outputs de energized when common disable input is de energized HFT 0 SIL 2 sd su 324 FIT dd 0 FIT du 1 0 FIT...

Страница 12: ...highly dependent on the component itself and its operating conditions temperature in particular for example the electrolytic capacitors can be very sensitive to the working temperature This assumption...

Страница 13: ...limited by the maximum switching cycles under load conditions You can see the relationship between the maximum switching power and the load conditions in the diagram below Figure 3 1 This is valid for...

Страница 14: ...to define the type of proof test and the interval time period The ancillary equipment required KFD0 RSH 1 Y2 A digital multimeter without special accuracy will be used as ohmmeter mid range recommend...

Страница 15: ...following tables and pictures Test each separate channel that is used in the safety function application and the respective safety path KFD0 RSH 1 Y2 Figure 4 1 Proof test set up for KFD0 RSH 1 The s...

Страница 16: ...een terminals 11 12 load resistor on output Multimeter shows 24 V DC 2 Attach the input voltage subsequently to each input and check that no output is switching For this test the line fault detection...

Страница 17: ...o effect on the safety function not part Probability of failure of components that are not in the safety path total safety function Safety function HFT Hardware Fault Tolerance MTBF Mean Time Between...

Страница 18: ...2014 07 18 Safety Manual SIL KFD0 RSH 1 Y2 KFD2 SL 4 Notes Safety Manual SIL KFD0 RSH 1 Y2 KFD2 SL 4...

Страница 19: ...Safety Manual SIL KFD0 RSH 1 Y2 KFD2 SL 4 Notes 2014 07 19...

Страница 20: ...rl fuchs com PROCESS AUTOMATION PROTECTING YOUR PROCESS Worldwide Headquarters Pepperl Fuchs GmbH 68307 Mannheim Germany Tel 49 621 776 0 E mail info de pepperl fuchs com For the Pepperl Fuchs represe...

Отзывы: