background image

IBM posts SPEC CPU2006 scores for BladeCenter HS21 XM dual-core blade  
 

May 13, 2008 ... IBM® BladeCenter® HS21 XM blade servers, coupled with the BladeCenter 
chassis, deliver advanced application serving with performance, power efficiency, and scalability, 
all of which makes them ideal for enterprise environments. 
 
The HS21 XM blade server, using Intel’s latest dual-core technology, has demonstrated 
competitive performance on the SPEC CPU2006 benchmark suite.  
 
The scores in the following tables are the first SPEC CPU2006 results published for the HS21 XM 
blade model using the Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor L5240 (3.00GHz, 6MB L2 cache, 1333 
MHz FSB, 40W). (1) These results were achieved using SUSE Linux® Enterprise Server 10 x64.  
 

SPEC CPU2006 

Benchmark

 

HS21 XM – Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor L5240 

(3.00GHz, 6MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz FSB, 40W)

 

SPECint2006

 

25.4 

SPECint_rate2006

 

76.8 

SPECint_rate_base2006

 

65.6 

SPECfp2006

 

22.9 

SPECfp_rate2006

 

54.4 

SPECfp_rate_base2006

 

48.9 

 
 
Results are current as of May 13, 2008. The scores have been submitted to SPEC for review and 
will be posted on their Web site upon successful completion of the review. View all published 
results at www.spec.org. 
                                                                                                                                                 
(1) Planned availability in the United States for the HS21 XM model using the Dual-Core Intel 
Xeon Processor L5240 is May 30, 2008.  
 
IBM and BladeCenter are trademarks or registered trademarks of International Business 
Machines Corporation.

 

Intel and Xeon are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation. 
Linux is a registered trademark of Linux Torvalds in the United States, other countries, or both.

 

SPEC, SPECfp, and SPECint registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation 
Corporation.

 

All other company/product names and service marks may be trademarks or registered 
trademarks of their respective companies.

 

 
 
 

 
 

Reviews: