background image

 
 

1 of 11

 

P R O D U C T   P R O F I L E  

 

Copyright

 The TANEJA Group, Inc. 2008. All Rights Reserved 

87 Elm Street, Suite 900     Hopkinton, MA  01748      Tel:  508-435-5040    Fax:  508-435-1530      www.tanejagroup.com 

Evaluating Enterprise-Class VTLs:  The IBM System Storage 

TS7650G ProtecTIER De-duplication Gateway  

 September 2008 

 

 

Increasingly  stringent  service  level  agreements  (SLAs)  are  putting  significant 
pressure  on  large  enterprises  to  address  backup  window,  recovery  point 
objective  (RPO),  recovery  time  objective  (RTO),  and  recovery  reliability  issues.  
While  the  use  of  disk  storage  technology  offers  clear  functional  advantages  for 
resolving  these  issues,  disk’s  high  cost  has  been  an  impediment  to  widescale 

deployment  in  the  data  protection  domain  of  the  enterprise  data  center.    Now  that  storage 
capacity  optimization  (SCO)  technologies  like  single  instancing,  data  de-duplication,  and 
compression  are  available  to  reduce  the  amount  of  raw  storage  capacity  required  to  store  a 
given amount of data, the $/GB costs for disk-based secondary storage can be reduced by 10 to 
20  times.    Virtual  tape  technology,  disk-based  storage  subsystems  that  appear  to  backup 
software  as  tape  drives  or  libraries,  are  one  of  the  most  popular  ways  to  integrate  disk into a 
pre-existing  data  protection  infrastructure  because  they  require  very  little  change  to  existing 
backup  and  restore  processes.    While  virtual  tape  libraries  (VTLs)  are  interesting,  SCO  VTLs 
that leverage data de-duplication and other related technologies are compelling. 
 
Given  high  data  growth  rates,  stringent  SLAs  for  data  protection,  and  the  need  to  contain 
spending, enterprise customers really need to take a look at SCO technologies.  Taneja Group 
predicts that large enterprises will rapidly move to SCO VTLs over the next 1-2 years while the 
market  for  non-SCO  VTLs  (VTLs  that  do  not  have  integrated  SCO  technologies)  dwindles 
rapidly.  Data growth rates in the 50% - 60% range will be pushing this transition as much as 
will  the  clear  cost  advantages  that  SCO  VTLs  offer  over  non-SCO  VTLs.    While  SCO  is  a  key 
requirement,  performance  remains  the  number  one  need  of  the  enterprise  data  protection 
environment.    After  all,  if  the  SLA  for  completing  the  day’s  backup  cannot  be  met,  all  other 
criteria are moot.  This has significant implications for vendors of SCO VTLs.  Their solutions 
must provide the capacity optimization that the enterprise customer demands, while enabling 
enterprise-class  performance.    Vendors  that  can  provide  both  efficient  SCO  technology  and 
enterprise class performance offer a very compelling value proposition.   
 
In this Product Profile, we discuss the criteria we recommend be used to compare and contrast 
enterprise-class  SCO  VTL  solutions  from  different  vendors,  and  then  evaluate  how  the  IBM 
System Storage TS7650G ProtecTIER De-duplication Gateway  performs against these criteria.  
The  TS7650G,  IBM’s  first  offering  based  on  technology  from  the  April  2008  acquisition  of 
Diligent  Technologies,  supports  very  high  single  system  throughput,  multiple  PBs  of  usable 
capacity,  and  optional  clustering  with  support  for  a  global  de-duplication  repository  -  all 
important considerations for enterprise SCO VTL prospects.     

 

Summary of Contents for TS7650G PROTECTIER DEDUPLICATION GATEWAY

Page 1: ...es are compelling Given high data growth rates stringent SLAs for data protection and the need to contain spending enterprise customers really need to take a look at SCO technologies Taneja Group pred...

Page 2: ...espread use throughout the enterprise With data expected to continue to grow at 50 60 a year the economics of SCO technology are just too compelling to ignore A Brief Primer on SCO Taneja Group has ch...

Page 3: ...ion work requires CPU cycles so where it is performed may have a performance impact that needs to be evaluated Source based SCO typically leverages resources on the backup client to perform the work w...

Page 4: ...for DR purposes and you cannot complete the backup ingest and the post processing within that 8 hour window then the post processing approach will impact your DR RPO Without a doubt in line approaches...

Page 5: ...nderstand the total time required to ingest and capacity optimize the backup to ensure that you will have sufficient time to meet any further backup processing requirements If your target is to comple...

Page 6: ...e index that is already there High availability In today s 24x7 environments even secondary data has to be highly available so that stringent SLAs can be met SCO VTLs cannot compromise that high avail...

Page 7: ...the muscle of a trusted storage supplier behind Diligent s unique and innovative ProtecTIER technologies IBM s announcement of the TS7650G ProtecTIER De Duplication Gateway in September 2008 represent...

Page 8: ...single VTL image to backup servers across which single system throughput can be scaled Based on data from ProtecTIER s installed base many of their customers are seeing single node sustained throughpu...

Page 9: ...mance and availability not just improved availability Evaluating the IBM TS7650G How well does the TS7650G perform against the criteria we identified earlier for evaluating SCO VTL solutions performan...

Page 10: ...IBM recommends the use of RAID capabilities supported by this back end disk to provide high data availability If higher levels of resiliency are desired users can flexibly configure storage subsystems...

Page 11: ...rates for this data over the next five years non SCO VTLs are generally not going to provide a sufficiently scalable cost effective solution as a backup target For this reason we see the VTL market r...

Reviews: