background image

IBM posts SPEC CPU2006 scores for quad-core BladeCenter HS21 XM 
blade  
 

November 20, 2007 ... IBM® BladeCenter® HS21 XM blade servers, coupled with the 
BladeCenter chassis, deliver advanced application serving with performance, power efficiency, 
and scalability, all of which makes them ideal for enterprise environments. 
 
The HS21 XM blade server, using Intel’s latest quad-core technology, has demonstrated 
competitive performance on the SPEC CPU2006 benchmark suite.  
 
The scores in the following tables are the first SPEC CPU2006 results published for the HS21 XM 
blade model using the Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor E5450 (3.00GHz, 12MB L2 cache, 
1333 MHz FSB). (1) These results were achieved using SUSE Linux® Enterprise Server 10 x64. 
 

SPEC CPU2006 

Benchmark

 

HS21 XM – Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor E5450 

(3.00GHz, 12MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz FSB)

 

SPECint2006

 

26.5 

SPECint_rate2006

 

129 

SPECint_rate_base2006

 

108 

SPECfp2006

 

23 

SPECfp_rate2006

 

74.9 

SPECfp_rate_base2006

 

68

 

 
 
Results are current as of November 20, 2007. The scores have been submitted to SPEC for 
review and will be posted on their Web site upon successful completion of the review. View all 
published results at www.spec.org. 
                                                                                                                                                 
(1) Planned availability in the United States for the HS21 XM model using the Quad-Core Intel 
Xeon Processor E5450 is December 14, 2007.  
 
IBM and BladeCenter are trademarks or registered trademarks of International Business 
Machines Corporation.

 

Intel and Xeon are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation. 
Linux is a registered trademark of Linux Torvalds in the United States, other countries, or both.

 

SPEC, SPECfp, and SPECint registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation 
Corporation.

 

All other company/product names and service marks may be trademarks or registered 
trademarks of their respective companies.

 

 
 
 

 
 

Reviews: