17
© G
ul
dm
an
n 08/2016 # 900686_4
© G
ul
dm
an
n 08/2016 # 900686_4
Sling inspection technique
The sling inspection procedure should be thorough, systematic and con
-
sistent; both visual and “hands on” inspection techniques are recommen
-
ded. Certain forms of damage are far more discernable through hands-on
inspection, than by visual inspection. For example, fabric stiffness, crushed
webbing, as well as, thinning fabric can be identified through tactile inspec
-
tion. Visual inspection alone may not reveal all forms of sling damage. Once
signs of damage have been identified, do not downgrade the work load limit
of the sling, with the intent of continuing to use it, but at limited capacity or
frequency. This is sometimes done to get more service life out of a damaged
sling. The operating rule and standard should be: intact = use; damage = do
not use.
Consider the practice of documenting sling inspections through written
inspection records. The documentation should include information such as:
the name of manufacturer, the sling stock number, width and length, the
unique sling identification number (important in differentiating similar slings),
as well as the condition of the sling. Other important information might also
include the date it was received or put into use at your facility and any special
features (if applicable). A beneficial outcome of an inspection program would
be the realization of repetitive forms of damage and the analysis that would
lead to specific recommendations.
Sample visual examples of synthetic sling damage
x
)
Chemical/caustic burns
Broken stitching
Crushed / Frayed webbing
Knots
